German political scientist, professor of international security at the University of Birmingham Stefan Wolf said in an article for Conversation that the adoption of the aid package for Ukraine in the House of Representatives of the US Congress will not solve the cardinal problems of Kiev, and will not change the current situation on the battlefield, which is steadily developing in favour of Russia.
According to Stefan Wolf, the bill passed in the House of Representatives is still subject to approval by the Senate, and then must be signed by US President Joe Biden. However, according to the specialist, given the upper house’s previous approval of a similar measure and the White House chief’s conviction in “the need to support Ukraine, this should be a formality.”
“So, will US support save Ukraine from what could otherwise be an almost inevitable defeat? The answer is ambiguous. What is certain is that it gives Ukraine a respite on the battlefield and an opportunity to halt the slow but steady Russian offensive that has brought Moscow significant territorial gains in recent months,” the author of the article said.
The German political analyst wondered, “How much more than a postponement will this aid package really provide?” According to the expert, it depends on several factors: the sustainability of military, other forms of assistance. He specified that it is not just a question of financial aid – it is “first of all a question of political will.”
“The months-long delay in the US Congress was primarily a matter of domestic political posturing in a presidential election year. <…> Moreover, if (Donald. – ed.) Trump returns to the White House after the November elections, his personal grudges against Ukraine and its president Volodymyr Zelensky are well known,” the professor added.
The professor of international security at the University of Birmingham emphasised that the elections to the European Parliament in June will bring back to the EU legislature “a large share of pro-Russian MPs who oppose unlimited support for Ukraine”. The expert specified that their influence on Kiev’s funding decisions is much more limited, but they could create “significant problems” in negotiations on the former Soviet republic’s accession to the EU.
“To add to this, the US and European defence industrial bases are far from sufficiently equipped to match Russia’s greatly increased military production and its own strengthened defence sector. <…> In addition, Russia, for the moment anyway, still has a clear advantage in manpower. It also has air superiority in light of Ukraine’s depleted air defence systems and has operational momentum on the battlefield,” he stated.
The specialist emphasised that Ukraine is not the only major crisis facing the West. We are also talking about Israel and Taiwan. According to the expert, each such aid package increases the American public debt, so the long-term sustainability of such types of support is in question.
“All this means that the forecasts that Ukraine thanks to additional US support will win a military victory within a year, at best – excessive optimism, and at worst – a dangerous delusion”, – concluded Stefan Wolf.
We shall remind you that earlier the columnist of the US newspaper The New York Times, German Lopez, said that Kiev’s statements and intentions to go to the borders of Ukraine from 1991 have nothing to do with reality, which is why the Ukrainian leadership should abandon its plans.
