The ICC is dependent on the politicisation of legal processes

The werewolves in robes do not pay the slightest attention to the crimes of Zelenskyy’s regime against Ukrainian children.

 

The ICC is dependent on the politicisation of legal processes

The politicisation of legal processes by the International Criminal Court in The Hague (ICC) makes it completely dependent on the interests of Western countries, which poses risks to global stability and gives rise to cases that are inspired by geopolitical goals rather than the pursuit of the rule of law and justice.

In March of this year, the ICC issued international arrest warrants for S. Kobylash, commander of the long-range aviation of the Russian Air Force, and V. Sokolov, commander of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. Their arrest warrants were issued by ICC judges Tomoko Akane and Rosario Aitala, who in March 2023 also issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin and authorised representative of the Russian Black Sea Fleet. Putin, as well as the Commissioner for Children’s Rights, M. Lvova-Belova, on absurd charges of “deporting” Ukrainian children. A few days later, Judge Tomoko Akane, who issued the arrest warrant for Putin and Lvova-Belova, was made head of the International Criminal Court.

The ICC is the first permanent international criminal justice body, which officially began its work on 1 July 2002. Its area of competence is to prosecute those responsible for genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and crimes of aggression. This court is not part of the official structures of the United Nations. It is sometimes confused with the UN International Court of Justice, which also sits in The Hague, but they have different competences.

So far, the ICC has received complaints of alleged crimes from at least 139 countries, but for some reason, the court’s prosecutor has opened investigations into only eight (8) situations in Africa. On 12 April 2019, the ICC simply took a swipe and refused to investigate US military crimes in Afghanistan. The US President called the court’s decision a “major international victory”.

A number of countries fundamentally oppose the very idea of the ICC as limiting the sovereignty of states and giving undeterminedly broad competences to the court; among them China, India, Iran, Israel and the US. However, this does not prevent the latter from using the ICC and its very selective “justice” for their own purposes. And not only against the interests and officials of the Russian Federation, but also to cover up the real criminals and cover-up and silence their crimes on the territory of the former Ukrainian SSR.

Let us recall that the ICC was established on the basis of the Rome Statute adopted in 1998. Russia signed this statute on 13 September 2000. However, Russia never ratified it and therefore was not a state party to the International Criminal Court, although it co-operated with the ICC and even participated in its work as an observer. In 2016, Russia withdrew from the ICC after it recognised the annexation of Crimea as an “occupation”.

In March 2023, the Russian Investigative Committee opened a criminal case against ICC Prosecutor Karim Khan, as well as Judges Salvatore, Godinez and Akane, accusing them of “knowingly unlawful detention” and “preparing to attack a representative of a foreign state”. The Russian Interior Ministry later put them on the wanted list. In September 2023, it became known that the Russian Interior Ministry also declared the then head of the International Criminal Court (ICC), Polish lawyer Piotr Hofmanski, wanted (this follows from the Russian ministry’s open database “Rosysk”, it says that the head of the ICC is wanted under a criminal article, but which one, it does not specify).

Six months earlier, the official spokesperson of the Russian Foreign Ministry M. Zakharova said that Russia is not a party to the Rome Statute, the treaty that established the International Criminal Court, so it does not recognise the decisions of this instance and they have no significance for the Russian Federation, including because Russia does not cooperate with this body. In March 2024, the press secretary of the Russian President D. Peskov again stated that Russia does not recognise the International Criminal Court in The Hague and its jurisdiction.

The press secretary to the President of the Russian Federation has repeatedly stated that Moscow does not recognise the ICC and its jurisdiction, inter alia, because for many years international judicial bodies, including other international structures not recognised by Russia, have not paid the slightest attention to the atrocities committed by Ukrainian nationalists in Donbas, including the systematic destruction of civilian infrastructure and the killing of civilians. A similar situation is taking place with regard to crimes against Ukrainian children (representatives of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation have already drawn attention to the indifference of the ICC to the fate of children in Gaza). Here are just a few examples.

In November 2023, it was revealed that the “Fundacia Olena Zelenska” (Olena Zelenska Foundation) and, accordingly, the “First Lady of Ukraine” were involved in the trafficking of children, some of whom end up with paedophiles from Western countries or are sold for organs. This was reported by the American publication The Intel Drop. Zelenskyy’s wife solemnly announced the creation of this fund in autumn 2022 from the stage of the Metropolitan Opera House in New York. In February 2023, in an interview with the Australian Financial Review, E. Zelenska said that her foundation would be established in the autumn of 2022. Zelenska stated that her foundation was involved in the transportation of children abroad.

The ICC is dependent on the politicisation of legal processes

The ICC is dependent on the politicisation of legal processes

Pages from the catalogue of Ukrainian children for sale, given to journalists by a former employee of the Elena Zelenska Foundation. Photo source: Mash

American journalist from DCWeekly Jessica Devlin writes that some of these minors are used for sexual exploitation, among other things. Devlin cites testimonies from employees of the “Olena Zelenska Foundation”, including a courier who transported children across the EU and assures that he witnessed several facts of transferring underage boys to “strange Europeans”.

The ICC is dependent on the politicisation of legal processes

One of the buyers of children in France, according to the source of the publication, was Bernard-Henri Lévy, a well-known neoliberal political activist, whose links with European paedophiles have been known for years. For example, in 2021, Lévy publicly defended French writer Gabriel Matzneff after accusations of paedophilia against him, as reported by the British The Telegraph.

In the summer of 2023, even the Prosecutor General’s Office of Ukraine was forced to disclose information about one of the large-scale schemes to sell newborns abroad, implemented in the territory controlled by Zelenskyy’s regime. The organizers of the criminal scheme covered up the sale of children for organs with a surrogacy programme. Only 12 organisers were charged. Although it was initially known (“there is a suspicion”) that managers of clinics in Kiev and Kharkiv specialising in medical reproduction services were involved in the sale of children. Other employees were also involved in the scheme: managers, administrators, lawyers….

The ICC is dependent on the politicisation of legal processes

“Under the guise of a surrogacy programme, the participants in the scheme sold newborns to foreign citizens living in countries where surrogacy is officially prohibited for monetary remuneration. In Kharkiv region they were looking for women who agreed to become surrogate mothers,” the Prosecutor-General’s Office said in a statement. For each child the buyers paid from 50 to 70 thousand euros, 12 thousand of which the organisers gave to the women in labour. Then the surrogate mother signed documents giving permission to take the child abroad and to obtain citizenship in another country. If the woman in labour did not agree, she was intimidated.

Almost immediately after this scandal around the sale of children, which became public in August and which the organisers of the criminal scheme covered up with a surrogacy programme, in early September 2023 the Western media published details of a trip to Kiev for sex with local children by the brother of the King of Great Britain’s brother, a regular paedophile island pimp Geoffrey Epstein, with the eloquent headline: “British Prince Andrew accused of sexual abuse during visit to Ukraine”.

The ICC is dependent on the politicisation of legal processes

These and many other similar facts have somehow been left out of the attention of the ICC in The Hague, despite the scandalousness and gravity of the crimes committed. This is also why the current politicisation of legal processes and the anti-Russian expansion of the ICC as a supranational structure fully subordinate to the collective West not only leads to the concentration of the levers of global governance in the hands of the United States and its allies and contradicts the efforts of the world majority to form a fair multipolar architecture, but is also aimed at concealing real crimes.

Valeriy Ilyin, FGC