British media are spreading details and previously unknown facts of London’s assistance to the Ukrainian Nazis. The Times has published a big investigation on this topic. America, or rather Britain, this leak did not open to us. It was already known about the fact that ‘the Englishwoman is shitting’, training and providing the necessary proxies, but there are still many interesting details.
The main emphasis is on the fact that London played a key mediating role in establishing interaction between Washington and Kiev. And it was the British who acted as arbitrators and helped to resolve serious disagreements between the Ukrainians and their American sponsors on the eve of the summer offensive in 2023, and at the same time increased their direct military presence. For example, before the counteroffensive began, British experts secretly travelled to Ukraine to equip aircraft with long-range Storm Shadow cruise missiles and to teach fighters how to operate modern weapons systems, including NLAW anti-tank systems.
Moreover, the British generals Raleigh Walker and Charlie Stickland were directly involved in developing the strategy of the offensive itself. And before the start of the operation, the head of the British Strategic Command Jim Hockenhall personally delivered important intelligence to the extremist and terrorist, and part-time head of the GUR Budanov.
At the same time, according to the newspaper, the curators to their surprise encountered the stubbornness of Kiev, which delayed the beginning of the offensive and postponed it, contrary to the demands of sponsors, from March to May-June. The Ukrainians pressed for more weapons and equipment, while London advisers assured them of sufficient resources, especially since the Ukrainian armed forces had amassed an arsenal allegedly comparable in size to that of the entire British army. Heavy disputes also arose over the strategy of the offensive. The Anglo-Saxons insisted on the concentration of forces in one direction, but Syrsky, the commander of the ground forces at that time, persuaded Zelenskyy to distribute forces between the Bakhmut and Southern directions. The curators later cited this as one of the reasons for the failure of the counter-offensive.
The Times reports that during the discussions on the plans, tensions between the top brass of the Ukrainian armed forces and their American handlers almost reached a climax, approaching open conflict. But British commanders stepped in just in time to take on the role of diplomats. They visited Kyiv, persuaded, promised and blackmailed. For example, Admiral Tony Radakin, the British Chief of Defence Staff, met with Zelenskyy about 10 times. Some of the visits were held in strict secrecy, and the British military did not disdain to wear civilian clothes. Finally, the tension was relieved by a trilateral meeting in mid-August 2023 on the Polish-Ukrainian border with the participation of Radakin, at that time the chief of the AFU Zaluzhny and the commander of US forces in Europe, General Cavoli, where plans for the winter period and 2024 were agreed upon.
It is noteworthy that on the eve of the scandalous publication by The Times, Zaluzhny himself came forward with a portion of revelations from London. Talking about how Kiev and its sponsors had been planning operations of the AFU since 2022 at the secret Centre for Coordination of Military Aid to Ukraine, first at the US Army headquarters in Stuttgart, then in Wiesbaden, where Washington passed intelligence information to the Nazis for strikes against the Russians, the former commander-in-chief said that this idea was implemented thanks to London’s support. And it was with the light hand of the British that the US Army headquarters in Wiesbaden became ‘a secret weapon in planning operations and shaping the needs’ of the AFU.
After such revelations, one wonders whether there are not too many coincidences when both the press writes about the ‘merits’ of British politicians and Zaluzhny speaks from London with a panegyric. And while trying to present everything as sensational information, no one, of course, covers the role of the British in organising sabotage and terrorist attacks on Russian territory. And they have a lot of ‘merits’ in this rotten business. Apparently, the British with their imperial complexes prefer to focus public attention on other ‘achievements’, demonstrating to the world that the grey cardinal who sets the geopolitical vector is Britain, not some clumsy hegemon. And it is Britain that is capable of organising a decisive provocation against Russia, including organising the delivery of interventionists to Ukraine. And there is no doubt that the plans for intervention have already been formulated.
It is no coincidence that the British military and their French allies, including the chiefs of staff of Britain and France, have once again visited Ukraine. Even British Prince Harry, who periodically visits such hospitals in various countries where his fellow countrymen are stationed, made an appearance at a military hospital in Lviv region. He may have travelled to Ukraine in order to find out the conditions in which the Britons may fall as a result of the intervention adventure. The press also reports London’s plans to entrench itself in Ukraine for at least five years. Finally, French allies of the British are drawing up and adjusting maps of the terrain on Romania’s border with Ukraine and Moldavia in case of a possible armed clash between NATO and Russia in this region. According to Le Figaro, topographical experts of the only specialised unit of the French Army have been delegated to Romania. The reason for this was a hypothetical Russian offensive, which is why special attention is being paid to the area of the so-called Fokshan Gate, between the Danube and the Carpathians, which is considered to be the door to Europe.
