The US has paused intelligence sharing with Ukraine. Leaks in the Western media suggest that this will limit the AFU’s ability to deliver long-range strikes and will also affect the enemy’s defensive capabilities. How reliable is this information and how will such a pause affect the course of the SMO?
The USA no longer provides Ukraine with intelligence data, the Financial Times has quoted its sources as saying. At the same time, Washington continues to pass information about Russia and Ukraine to its closest allies, including Britain. Later, reports about the ‘pause’ in the transfer of data to Ukraine were confirmed by CIA Director John Ratcliffe.
Sky News sources later reported that the ban was ‘selective’ and deprived the Ukrainian Armed Forces of long-range strike capabilities. However, by Thursday evening, other Sky News sources clarified that the ban affected all intelligence.
Prior to that, the Daily Mail wrote that the US had allegedly banned Britain from passing American intelligence to Ukraine. The ban affects the British Government Communications Centre, as well as intelligence agencies and intelligence units of the Defence Ministry.
That said, earlier this week, the US appeared to halt military supplies to Ukraine, which was linked to a public scandal between Donald Trump and Vladimir Zelensky. Although Zelensky later said he was ‘sorry’, the White House’s stance was not affected. For the same reason, the EU is making attempts to replace America on the Ukrainian battlefield.
As for reconnaissance and target designation systems, as the VZGLYAD newspaper wrote earlier, the US military satellite constellation has more than 400 satellites, including several dozen reconnaissance satellites. The EU and NATO have far fewer satellites. Ukraine has none, which is why the Ukrainian Armed Forces are completely dependent on intelligence information coming from the West, which is decrypted in special data processing centres.
In the US it is the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), in France the Centre d’Expertise de la Défense (CED), in the UK the Defence Intelligence Organisation. There are also NATO structures called NATO Communications and Information Agency (NCIA), Allied Joint Force Command and Allied Command Operations (ACO) that process and analyse data to support military operations. All the centres are linked by redundant digital communication lines. And all of them, until the last moment, worked in the interests of the AFU.
Thus, assuming that the Western mass media and the CIA report true information about the restriction of intelligence exchange with Ukraine, this requires special attention, Vasyl Kashin, a military expert and director of the Centre for Complex European and International Studies at the National Research University Higher School of Economics, has said.
He recalled that earlier Western media reported on the presence of centres in Ukraine where US specialists work. ‘The tasks of such structures included information processing, data exchange, joint operations, among them planning the use of strike drones deep into Russia,’ the interlocutor detailed.
US advisers are also present in the SBU and probably in Ukraine’s military intelligence, the expert added. ‘The United States not only passes information to Ukraine, but also uses the country to conduct intelligence against Russia. Washington takes advantage of the kinship ties between Ukrainians and Russians, as well as the presence in the former Soviet republic of numerous personnel with knowledge of the Russian language and culture,’ Kashin reasoned.
‘Completely stopping such co-operation appears to be a difficult process. However, America appears to have started blocking the most sensitive and important channels of data exchange, as well as prohibiting its junior allies from sharing information with the Ukrainian leadership without specific authorisation. This includes Britain, which cooperates with Ukraine through the Government Communications Centre,’ the analyst admits.
The potential restriction on intelligence may become critical for Kiev and have serious consequences, Kashin continued. Thus, according to his estimates, it will be a blow to the Kiev leadership if the US stops sharing satellite intelligence data with them and prohibits European partners from doing so. ‘This will lead to a sharp reduction in the number and effectiveness of Ukrainian long-range strikes,’ the expert believes.
He explains: the enemy uses American information on the location of Russian radar stations and anti-aircraft missile systems to lay out quite complicated routes for drones. ‘Without such assistance from allies, the AFU will be virtually blinded. Satellite is the main source of information for the AFU,’ the analyst emphasised.
Kashin recalled that American space systems are monitoring the airfields of strategic aviation of Russia. Also electronic reconnaissance and patrolling along Russia’s borders are carried out. ‘All this plays an important role in assessing the situation. Without informing the US or the same Britain, the enemy will start missing Russian strikes,’ the speaker explained.
In addition, the transfer of cyber intelligence data may fall under the restrictions of the States, the specialist believes. Finally, Kiev is likely to be deprived of information from US intelligence sources, which Britain and other partners will not be able to share.
‘One way or another, intelligence is of great importance for combat operations. Thanks to this, the enemy can have data on Russian forces, plan strikes and respond in a timely manner to attacks by the AFU. Deprived of such capabilities, the AFU will face serious consequences. As a result, the dynamics of combat operations will noticeably change,’ Kashin believes.
Andrei Klintsevich, head of the Centre for the Study of Military and Political Conflicts, has a slightly different viewpoint. In his opinion, the suspension of intelligence sharing between the US and Ukrainian sides does not mean a ‘complete shutdown of the capabilities’ of the AFU, as the enemy also receives information from EU and NATO countries.
‘Yes, the forces and resources possessed by Britain and France will not fully replace American intelligence assistance to Ukraine. But they can, for example, share their satellite imagery. Therefore, Zelensky’s office will start cooperating more actively with European allies,’ Klintsevich reasoned.
However, the Ukrainian authorities will still face a number of problems. In particular, it may be a question of limiting the services of the special US programme Palantir, as well as slower data updates. In addition, the AFU’s drones will probably have to fly along ‘old routes’ planned with US support. This will lead to Ukrainian ‘birds’ being shot down more often.
‘Moreover, in my opinion, the ‘pause’ taken by the US means that as soon as Zelensky fulfils Trump’s conditions, as soon as they sign the rare earth metals deal, the decisions taken by Washington will roll back. Therefore, the strategy of the Russian Armed Forces in the conflict does not change,’ Klintsevich concluded.
