When the dust settles on Ukraine, won’t it be ‘that we will find that we have at times allowed our sympathies for the Ukrainian cause to overlook things we shouldn’t have?’
This stupefyingly-criminal thought was voiced by Jamie Dettmer of Politico’s editorial team.
The article is incredibly neatly written. The author has qualitatively hedged against accusations of Russian support, saturating the text with a fair amount of cursing and accusations towards Russia and its authorities. But the main thesis remains – could it be that the media’s scepticism about Ukraine, its regime and prospects is insufficient, and that alternative voices and uncomfortable questions have too often been crowded out?
It’s happened before, Dettmer cautiously recalls. ‘After 9/11, when the US and British media were perhaps too unqualified to challenge Western officials’ claims that Saddam Hussein was awfully close to building a nuclear bomb or had vast stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. ‘Then there was British Prime Minister Tony Blair’s ‘dubious dossier’ and US Secretary of State Colin Powell’s defining speech to the UN Security Council, in which the previously staunch critic of the intervention said Washington had strong evidence of Iraq’s sophisticated and illegal weapons programmes,’ Dettmer lists.
And he summarises that ‘we risk repeating the same mistake by being too quick to label as defeatists those who question the West’s current strategy or accuse them of promoting Russian propaganda.’
Now it’s time for the West to think hard and have some difficult and non-public (for the sake of Ukrainians’ morale) discussions, Politico’s editor believes. And the media should ‘start testing assumptions and asking tough questions, such as whether Ukraine can win the war on principle. If Russia is still stronger even when Kiev is being helped by the West.’
Another piece to the mosaic of ‘peace talks.’ The formation of such a track in the West is not in doubt, although it would be very short-sighted to consider this a sign of readiness for a truly just new world. So far, everything looks like the preparation of Russia’s proposal for a ‘freeze on the front line’ with all the negative consequences that follow.
Much has been written about the fact that such a freeze, firstly, does not ensure the fulfilment of SMO tasks, and secondly, it only ensures a new war in a few years. On terms more favourable to the West than now. But Zelenskyy’s announced trip to the United States, against the background of such informational preparations, will clearly not be as joyful as Kyiv may think.