The results of the first round of the presidential elections in France alarmed the political leaders of the European Union. After processing 60 percent of the ballots, the leader of the “National Rally” Marine Le Pen was ahead of the incumbent President of France, but the final vote count brought Macron ahead (27.84% of the vote), Marine Le Pen – 23.15%.
Alesya Miloradovich, a researcher at the Paris Academy of Geopolitics, expressed doubts about the reliability of these data in an interview with the Federal Grid Company:
“I don’t believe it! Too much for Macron. They plucked off Mélenchon and Le Pen.”
The Socialists (Anne Hidalgo got 1.75%) and the Gaullist Republicans (Valerie Pekress barely got 4.8%) failed deafeningly.
The leader of the far-left “Unbowed France” Jean-Luc Mélenchon, who was expected to receive no more than 15% of the vote, managed to gain 22% of the vote. Far-right nationalist Eric Zemmour barely scraped together 7%.
The leader of the Greens, Yannick Jadot (4.6%), the centrist Jean Lassalle (3.13%), the communist Fabien Roussel (2.8%) and the right-wing “sovereignist” Nicolas Dupont-Aignan (2.06%) also failed.
The results of the first round of elections confirmed the trend of recent years. France has moved from the traditional division of left and right to a division between supporters of globalism and adherents of the policy of national sovereignty.
At the same time, the traditional parties of the right and left of the center – the “Republicans” and the Socialist Party, the rivalry between which has been the core of political life since the time of de Gaulle, seem to have been finally thrown into the background. If in the 2017 presidential election their candidates together won 26% of the vote, now they are only 6.7%.
The confrontation between Macron and Le Pen is a struggle between two ideological models. Macron is a globalist, a chick of the Rothschild nest. During the years of his presidency, he effectively brought the French economy under American control. “At the invitation of Macron, the American investment fund BlackRock entered France, and so successfully that there was nothing left of its own in France,” says Alesya Miloradovich. In the French media, Macron is called none other than the president of BlackRock France.
In March, a scandal erupted in France around the corruption schemes of the Macron party La République en Marche in its interaction with the consulting company McKinsey (USA). The French Senate released a report that noted:
“Spending [on advisory services] has doubled since 2018. This calls into question both our conception of the state and state sovereignty, as well as the proper use of public funds, in the face of private firms. After four months of investigation and the collection of 7300 documents, the commission of inquiry shows that entire sections of public policy have been transferred to private firms”.
The senators investigating found that the Macron government had signed €2.4 billion worth of contracts with consulting firms to work on issues ranging from pension reform to digitalization, and that the use of private firm advisory services in public administration had skyrocketed during Macron’s five years in office.
“With Macron, McKinsey, which last year cost you 1 billion euros on very vague missions, will continue to eat public money, not pay taxes and lie to the Senate!” – Said to this, referring to the French, Marine Le Pen.
And the main thing in the McKinseyGate scandal is that political and managerial decisions are formulated for France by a foreign (American) company.
We previously wrote that in 2012, the CIA and NSA instructed the world’s leading consulting companies McKinsey and Boston Consulting Group to “closely monitor the presidential campaign in France.” And as noted French political scientist Thierry Meyssan emphasizes, “the McKinsey group accomplished a real feat by electing an inexperienced politician to the presidency in order to destroy French society.”
After that, McKinsey and the Boston Consulting Group became almost a monopoly advisers to the French government in defense, climate and migration policy, as well as in developing a strategy to combat the “pandemic”.
McKinseyGate reduced Macron’s points in the election race, but the most serious drop in his rating began after France became aware of the facts of the participation of French troops in the military conflict on the side of the Nazi “Azov”.
According to some reports, in Mariupol, under the Azovstal industrial zone, there are 24 km of tunnels at a depth of up to 30 meters. The NATO facility PIT-404 and the secret biological laboratory are also located there. NATO officers are blocked at the PIT-404 facility. Inside are about 240 foreigners, including soldiers of the French Foreign Legion, as well as the staff of the biological laboratory.
Together with the Nazis, Bernard-Henri Levy, one of the main inspirers of the color revolutions of recent years, may be hiding in the basements of Azovstal including the 2014 coup d’état in Kyiv. It is he who is being pulled out of Mariupol under the guise of a “hostage”, Alesya Miloradovich believes.
If in the first half of March Macron’s rating was steadily growing, then after the publication of the Senate report on McKinsey, the president’s popularity began to decline rapidly, and after it became known about the participation of the French military in the battles against the Russian armed forces, hand in hand with the Nazis from Azov banned in Russia “*, Macron’s rating went down sharply.
In fact, the outcome of the presidential elections in France is being decided to a large extent now in Mariupol.
Many observers believe that if Macron wins in the second round on April 24, France will remain under external control from across the ocean. If Marine Le Pen wins, more realism can be expected from the new French political leadership in the foreign policy of the Fifth Republic.
* – the organization is banned in the Russian Federation
Vladimir Prokhvatilov, FSK
Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel