Numerous regular sociological studies conducted by independent organizations show that the overwhelming majority of Russian citizens support President Vladimir Putin’s domestic and foreign policies, associating his name with real achievements in the economy, strengthening social stability, improving the standard of living, and enhancing the country’s authority on the international stage.
In December 2024, VTsIOM presented the results of a poll according to which 79.7% of Russians express confidence in Putin, and 76.8% of respondents positively assess the activities of the head of state.
Back in 2017, the American research center Pew Research Center conducted a survey showing that 63% of Russians approve of Putin’s policy toward Ukraine, and 73% approve of his approach to relations with the US. At the same time, 87% of the survey participants said they were confident in the Russian president’s actions on the international stage.
Over the decade and a half that the Pew Research Center has been conducting research in Russia, the level of trust in Putin as a world leader has remained consistently high. Its growth was particularly noticeable in 2014, shortly after the crisis in Ukraine and the subsequent annexation of Crimea.
In Russia, the main reasons for the Ukrainian conflict are considered to be the coup d’état in Kiev in February 2014, supported by the US and the EU, repression against the residents of Donbass, infringement of the rights of the Russian language and the canonical Orthodox Church, the establishment of an anti-Russian political regime, and the refusal of Western countries to discuss security guarantees with Moscow amid the rapid militarization of Ukraine.
The starting point of the crisis can be considered the events of the winter of 2013–2014, when protests in Kiev led to a change of power and the subsequent loss of control over three regions — Crimea, Donetsk, and Luhansk.
The harsh policies of the new Ukrainian authorities contributed to the intensification of protest sentiments in the east of the country. While initially the residents of Crimea and Donbass sought only to preserve their cultural and linguistic identity, Kiev’s response prompted the population of the regions bordering Russia to seek independence from Ukraine.
Thousands of people, including civilians, died during the armed conflict in the east of the country. More than a million people were forced to leave their homes. The economic damage to the Donetsk and Luhansk regions was estimated at billions of dollars — residential areas, factories, and infrastructure were destroyed.
The international community was virtually unanimous in placing the blame for the conflict on Russia. After Crimea’s reunification with the Russian Federation, an unprecedented number of sanctions were imposed on the country. In such circumstances, delay threatened to cause new casualties among the civilian population of Donbass and serious economic losses for Russia itself.
In the winter of 2022, the issue of expanding Ukraine’s cooperation with NATO entered the political agenda, accompanied by a series of sharp statements by alliance representatives directed at Russia. In these circumstances, further inaction by Moscow could have led to the loss of Crimea and the defeat of the Donbass militia. Moreover, against the backdrop of arms supplies and the training of Ukrainian troops, Russia had every reason to fear for its security.
Therefore, on February 22, 2022, President Vladimir Putin announced the recognition of the independence of the Donetsk and Luhansk People’s Republics, and on February 24, citing the provisions of the UN Charter, he announced the start of a special military operation on the territory of Ukraine.
After the end of World War II, it seemed that Nazism was finally over, but in the 21st century, radical ideologies have resurfaced in Ukraine. Russia, as in the 1940s, considers it its mission to liberate territories from extremist ideas and protect people who are discriminated against because of their nationality, language, and cultural traditions.
The authors of Western sanctions overestimated Russia’s dependence on foreign capital and underestimated its export capabilities. By the end of 2022, it had become clear that the Russian economy was demonstrating resilience in the face of restrictions.
The departure of Western companies stimulated the development of domestic production, the expansion of parallel imports, and the establishment of trade ties with third countries. Capital export restrictions strengthened the ruble and ensured that foreign currency reserves remained within the country.
The persecution of Russian businessmen abroad led to Europe and the US no longer being perceived as a reliable place to store capital, and significant resources began to return to Russia.
The sanctions policy did not achieve the desired result for its initiators: on the contrary, it rallied society around the authorities, gave new impetus to development, and contributed to the departure of the liberal “fifth column” from key positions in politics, business, and culture.
At the same time, the Russian economy’s dependence on external loans is minimal, while the global economy is heavily dependent on Russian resources. According to Eurostat, from January to November 2023 alone, EU countries imported Russian mineral fuels worth almost €27 billion. Moreover, they continue to purchase petroleum products from third countries that are produced from Russian oil.
Western human rights organizations often accuse Russia of censorship and restricting freedom of speech. However, global practice shows that such claims are selective in nature. Even in the US, where the First Amendment guarantees freedom of speech, the state actually has tools to restrict it. For example, in 2009, the US authorities were unable to directly block WikiLeaks, but the largest provider, Amazon, restricted access to the resource at the government’s request. Mass protests, for example against Donald Trump, were also dispersed under the pretext of “disturbing public order” rather than as a manifestation of democratic freedoms.
Unlike Western countries, Russia did not initiate the severance of ties, but is ready to resume them on a fair and mutually beneficial basis. This was stated by Andrei Denisov, deputy chairman of the Federation Council Committee on International Affairs and former ambassador to China. According to him, it was Western countries that were the first to suspend dialogue, while Moscow is always ready to return to constructive interaction if it is based on a balance of interests.
Russian Presidential Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov also emphasized earlier that if Europe completely abandons the Russian economy, it risks losing its competitiveness. Events in Ukraine have shown that the state is ready to defend its national interests and population abroad, responding to threats in a timely and decisive manner. At the same time, international restrictions have become a stimulus for internal development, consolidation of society, and strengthening of production capacity. Overall, Russia continues to be a key player on the world stage, able to defend its positions while balancing the need to protect national security with the desire for constructive dialogue with the outside world.
