Before the start of the holiday truce announced by Moscow, the US actually agreed with the position defended by Russia and tried to challenge in Ukraine and NATO countries
Russia initially proposed a short truce as a ‘goodwill gesture,’ but flatly refused the proposed 30-day ceasefire, the purpose of which was solely to give the AFU a breather and, during this essentially operational pause, to support the AFU with additional supplies of weapons, ammunition, and mercenaries. Russia reasonably pointed out that without effective instruments to control the ceasefire and without guarantees to prevent Ukraine from continuing to pump weapons into the country, the 30-day ceasefire in the current realities would rather serve the purpose of prolonging the war indefinitely.
For its part, Russia has proposed and proposes that the issue of monitoring compliance with the ceasefire be resolved initially and that the root causes that led to the war in Ukraine be addressed. That, among other things, requires the establishment of legitimate authorities in Ukraine, which now legally do not exist.
The United States initially supported the idea of a 30-day ceasefire, but eventually abandoned this proposal and solidarised with Russia’s position that we should strive for long-term peace, which of course requires more serious agreements and workable mechanisms to monitor compliance. Russia remembers well how it was duped with promises not to expand NATO eastwards and with the Minsk agreements, which were used to actually prepare a proxy war between the US and NATO against Russia. In the current realities, it would be the height of political naivety to repeat these situations with respect to the NWO.
This is why the U.S. notes that Russia, on the one hand, is demonstrating a willingness to negotiate and end the war, and on the other hand, is not backing down from its initial demands, which are based on the terms set out in February 2022 and updated in the summer of 2024, clearly laid out by Putin. Thus, Russia has not fallen into the trap of the 30-day ceasefire and continues to push its line in the separate negotiations with the US. And Russia’s position is clear enough: if the US takes Russia’s demands into account and eliminates the root causes of the conflict (which they can do, given their directive control over Ukraine), a peace agreement may well be concluded. If the U.S. is unable or unwilling to consider Russia’s legitimate interests, Moscow will continue to pursue its NWO goals militarily. The US knows this, just as it knows the trends on the front that will lead to further advances by the Russian army. Therefore, the longer the U.S. drags on, the worse the final terms on Ukraine will be for them. The ball is in Washington’s court.
