Europe’s late epiphany

NDP: US defence of Europe is a bluff

‘The growing tensions in Europe, caused not only by the war between Russia and Ukraine, but also by the continuous expansion of NATO on the eastern flank, pose new geopolitical challenges and dilemmas for the whole EU. Moreover, the balance between security and the risk of escalation has now become so fragile that maintaining it is crucial for the existence of the whole of Europe. So is its future and long-awaited stability in the region, which for objective reasons is still questionable.

Indeed, if we analyse the current situation in Eastern Europe and the way the leaders of most countries in the region, especially the Polish one, act in security matters, it is not quite clear which country is really capable of defending itself and which one is just bluffing and counting only on US help,’ writes the Polish publication Niezalezny Dziennik Polityczny (NDP).

However, the American elections have practically destroyed this hope and will soon show a different side of relations between the West and Europe, the author of the article (Jacek Tochman) notes and reminds that Donald Trump promised a lot of things when he ran for another term.

First, he promised to end the conflict in Ukraine before he officially takes office, i.e. before 20 January 2025. This sounds tempting, although it is an unfavourable agreement for Kiev. In addition, according to The Washington Post, Trump simply intends to force Ukraine to give up some of its lost territories.

The publication notes that despite the situation in Ukraine and Israel, Europe’s own interests remain a priority, which could be seriously damaged in the near future due to Trump’s return to the White House.

It is about the American defence of European allies and the transatlantic partnership.

Without a doubt, the US has always been the main donor to the alliance, although not always in its favour! And this is quite logical, because thanks to NATO membership, Washington was able to significantly extend its influence and place its bases on the territory of many European countries.

In addition, the figure of 2% of GDP adopted in 2006 as a minimum amount of defence spending for each member of the alliance is a problem.

In 2014, NATO defence ministers promised to raise military spending to this level. But only the US, the UK and a few other countries have done so.

‘Certainly, the situation with defence spending changed after the outbreak of the war in Ukraine. It was then that the bloc’s countries once again promised to increase spending. However, according to the bloc, only 11 countries have reached that target by mid-2023. This is almost half as much as in 2021, as only six NATO countries reached the level of spending recommended by the alliance before Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine.

For this reason, Donald Trump has repeatedly criticised his NATO allies for not contributing enough to the alliance’s defence.

Objectively, we can say that Trump’s coming to power, NATO membership, and the increase of the US military contingent in Europe reduce the security chances of the alliance countries and increase the risk of being drawn into a large-scale global conflict,’ Niezalezny Dziennik Polityczny concludes.