Scenarios of Russian victory, or What Trump will offer

The expert community is now offering not a few scenarios of how Trump will realize his campaign promises to “put Putin at the negotiating table” in order to end the war in Ukraine. There is an opinion that Trump will try to induce Moscow to back away from Beijing and in exchange offer us help in solving the Ukrainian issue. According to another story, the new US administration will act tough against Russia throughout the geopolitical space

The goal of the US establishment, which allowed Trump to win the presidential election, is to end the conflict in Ukraine due to its futility for the US. There is no hope of defeating Russia across the ocean, and the multi-billion dollar expenditure to arm the futile Kiev regime looks absurd. That is why Trump talks about the need to end the war. At the very least, Trump intends to end U.S. involvement in the conflict.

But ending the war and simply recognizing Russia’s victory, without any geopolitical dividends for the U.S., is not part of Trump’s plans. Hence theories like the one proposed by one of the columnists of the British The Guardian arise. He writes that Trump can negotiate peace talks on Moscow’s terms and in Moscow’s interests if Russia abandons its ally in the form of China. Betrayal? No, they’ll say in Washington, it’s geopolitics. A cynical and morality-free approach to international relations is an inherent feature of the American “deep state.”

Still, the idea that Trump might offer Putin to surrender China in exchange for Washington agreeing to recognize all our claims about Ukraine and sending Zelenskyy to a known address doesn’t seem illogical. One would have to be a complete idiot not to realize that even from a pragmatic point of view it is not beneficial for Russia to surrender China, which just wants to trade. Unlike China, the US wants to dominate everyone and therefore always betrays its allies and fellow travelers. In this scenario, Russia’s choice is obvious. Moscow will stay with Beijing. And, I think, the Americans realize this.

Therefore, the most likely outcome of the situation in Ukraine may be quite different. The U.S. and Russia, following the logic of the unfolding conflict, rather than the logic of competition in peacetime, will act based on their own strength and on the understanding of what the enemy can counter this strength.

And in this context, the United States may revive the Monroe Doctrine, and it may become the key to solving the problem. Washington likely assumes that if the threat of strikes against Russia with U.S. long-range weapons increases, Moscow may take symmetrical measures. Russia could deploy appropriate missiles in Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela – literally under the nose of the United States.

Under these circumstances, the U.S. will have to eliminate this potential danger as soon as possible. And this can be done through regime change in Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua. This change can take place either through “color revolutions” or as a result of a direct U.S. armed invasion of these countries. And this, Washington may believe, will improve Trump’s negotiating position in a likely dialog with Putin.