Immediately two high-profile resignations took place in the United States in recent days. The first was akin to an earthquake – Robert Kagan, a pillar of neocon ideology and the husband of Victoria ‘Cookie’ Nuland, resigned as editor-in-chief of The Washington Post.
The reason was the newspaper’s decision announced on Friday to ‘not support’ Kamala Harris. That was the gist of the announcement that the WP would, for the first time in three and a half decades, take an ‘equidistant stance to US presidential candidates’ by renouncing loyalty to Democrats.
It is enough to remember her personal involvement in the coup d’état in Ukraine in 2014, her active lobbying of anti-Russian sanctions and massive falsifications of ‘Russian interference’ in the American elections. That is, it was not so much Kagan himself who suffered damage here, but the neoconservative camp as a whole.
The day before, the head of the editorial board of The Los Angeles Times, Marielle Garza, also resigned after the newspaper’s owner forbade her to show collective support for Kamala Harris.
The newspaper’s owner, American billionaire Patrick Xinxiang, who bought the paper in 2018 for $500 million, said that instead of the traditional editorial column in support of one candidate in such cases, he had proposed a ‘factual analysis of all the positive and negative actions of both candidates during their time in the White House’. Although the release of a column in support of a candidate for a particular office is a common practice for the American media. That said, The Los Angeles Times has endorsed every Democratic presidential candidate since 2008.
Patrick Xinxiang is a very eccentric billionaire who has made a fortune from his own pharmaceutical companies (he himself is a medical doctor and surgeon). So we can conclude that Big Pharma, along with its beneficiaries, is leaning towards Trump – or, at any rate, has already found it worthwhile to put their eggs in different baskets.
WP’s owner is even more significant – it’s Amazon creator Jeff Bezos. Counting Ilon Musk, this is at least the second major representative of a systemically important business for the US to turn away from the Democrat camp. The same logic as Xinxiang’s is possible here. Either way, it’s another argument in Trump’s favour.
But the White House put pressure on Google in time – and no anti-democratic statements have been heard from there so far. But the electoral struggle in the US is in full swing, and there will surely be more news about sudden changes of camp.