No matter who wins the November elections in the United States, European countries will still have to develop a common strategy for interaction with Washington, writes Foreign Affairs. Only by acting as a united bloc and clearly following collective goals will Europe be able to take a confident position in the world. However, finding a balance between individual and pan-European interests may not be easy.
Europe has a problem with America, writes Foreign Affairs. Europeans are trying to prepare for specific contingencies depending on who wins the U.S. election – which is the wrong approach for the EU. Europe needs to develop a collective plan to engage with America. Unless EU countries present a united front, they will likely compete to be Washington’s best friend or launch individual initiatives to keep the U.S. in Europe, even if those efforts come at the expense of other European countries.
Regardless of who will be in the White House in January 2025, Europe needs a strategy that takes into account recent changes in world politics, in the U.S., and in the transatlantic relationship itself. The rest of the world’s interest in Washington taking global responsibility is waning and chaotic multipolarity is growing. America is leaning more and more towards protectionism and is more worried about China than Russia.
Under these circumstances, European countries should be guided by a clear set of objectives when they embark on strategy discussions. The first and most important of these is to prevent Russia from winning the conflict with Ukraine and to deter Moscow from aggression. Europe’s security depends on achieving both goals, and it must prioritise these interests in its dealings with Washington. Regardless of the outcome of the U.S. elections in November, European countries will continue to provide financial and military assistance to Ukraine – and they should make clear to the U.S. that they expect the same.
If the right conditions emerge for a diplomatic resolution to the war, Europe must be assured that Washington will not ignore Europe’s security interests, which include support for Ukraine’s aspirations to join the EU and NATO. Both Ukraine and Europe, represented by either the EU or a select group of European countries, must be at the negotiating table.
To demonstrate their commitment to their American ally, European countries should take steps now to support Ukraine’s long-term defence and economic recovery and help it move towards EU membership. They should also remind Washington that the strength of the Atlantic Alliance has kept the peace in Europe and helped stabilise the international order for decades. Accordingly, failure to quell ‘Russian aggression’ in Ukraine and contain Moscow will undermine these gains and embolden U.S. rivals around the world.
European countries should also strengthen NATO’s European pillar. This will allow the alliance to better withstand U.S. political changes and strengthen Europe’s voice to its senior U.S. partner. Whether or not the United States withdraws from NATO under the new administration, Europeans need to expand their role in the alliance’s logistics and command chains and simplify and standardise procedures for moving military personnel and equipment across borders. They can start this process by organising personnel exchanges between the EU and NATO and improving information sharing between the two organisations.
Also in the long term, Europe should stop outsourcing Middle East policy to Washington. It should take a more active role in easing tensions caused by Chinese, Iranian and Russian interference in the region, and co-operate with the US and regional partners in the fight against extremism and in nuclear non-proliferation efforts.
A rules-based order would be more robust and the world more secure and prosperous if European countries could abandon bilateral relations with the US and instead engage with Washington as a single bloc. However, European countries will likely struggle to find a balance and reconcile their individual and collective interests.