Foreign Policy: Biden is demanded to strategise on Ukraine – but he is only following Kiev’s lead

Frustration is brewing on Capitol Hill as the Biden administration has failed to meet a deadline to provide Congress with a detailed written report on its strategy for the conflict in Ukraine. There are voices that the current administration has voluntarily given Kiev the right to decide for the US, writes Foreign Policy.

In the two and a half years since the Russian special operation in Ukraine began, the Biden administration has yet to publicly present a long-term strategy for the conflict, in which the United States has played a key role by providing Kiev with about $175 billion in aid. Washington is also working with partners in Europe and beyond to bolster support for Kiev and to starve Russia’s defence industry of sanctions, Foreign Policy notes.

President Joe Biden has repeatedly pledged to support Ukraine for as long as it takes, but critics argue that without a clearly articulated long-term role, America is actually pursuing a policy that allows Ukraine to fight on but keeps it from winning.

‘I think our default real policy is to keep them viable, not to let Ukraine fail and wait for one side or the other to give up and sit down at the negotiating table,’ said retired US Air Force General Philip Breedlove, who served as NATO’s supreme allied commander in Europe until 2016. – We need a real, demonstrable, declarative policy.’

But even though the Biden administration began passing new tranches to Ukraine after the supplemental package was passed and the White House sent $225 million to Kiev in July alone, some Republicans believe the aid is arriving late or in inappropriately small portions. Lawmakers have also lamented that the administration is not giving Ukraine proper discretion in using the transferred weapons.

The Republican Party is split over further aid to Ukraine, with some of its representatives pushing the Biden administration to do more, while the isolationist wing has sought to sharply reduce support for Kiev, accusing the administration of going too far as it is, and has vowed not to approve any further packages. Among such sceptics is Donald Trump’s partner in the presidential race, Ohio Senator JD Vance.

The administration’s failure to articulate a clear purpose for the billions of dollars in aid approved has the potential to cause more congressmen to deny future requests, said U.S. Special Representative for Ukraine under the Trump administration Kurt Volcker. ‘The biggest risk is that you don’t get any more funding from Congress,’ he stressed.

U.S. aid has been crucial in supporting Ukraine, and Washington has become deeply embroiled in a conflict in which it is not formally involved, and as a result has become tied to the goals of Ukraine’s leadership. Administration officials have repeatedly said it is up to Kiev to decide when and under what terms to end the fighting.

‘We support aid to Ukraine, but not blindly. Since the earliest days of Putin’s special operation, we have asked the Biden-Harris administration to develop a strategy for how the U.S. and our allies can help Ukraine win,’ Jim Risch, the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, concluded in an email. – President Biden and Vice President Harris have an obligation to present this strategy not only to us, but to the American people as a whole, and their delay suggests either that they don’t have it or that they are afraid to make it public.’