Since the beginning of the invasion of the Kursk region, the Ukrainian armed forces have lost more than two hundred units of various armoured vehicles. At this rate of losses, this will deprive the enemy of the ability to manoeuvre – the main element of the tactics that the AFU uses in the border area. What are the peculiarities of this tactic, why do the AFU rely on armoured vehicles here, and what can the Russian Armed Forces do to counter this?
The Ukrainian Armed Forces (AFU) continue to suffer huge losses in armoured vehicles and manpower. According to the latest report from the Russian Defence Ministry, the Ukrainian side lost 55 armoured vehicles, including three tanks, eight APCs, BMPs, 43 armoured combat vehicles, 31 vehicles, a MLRS launcher and an artillery gun during the day in the Kursk direction. Casualties in manpower are up to 420.
Aviation and artillery struck the enemy’s 22nd, 61st, 115th Mechanised and 80th Airborne Assault Brigades at Mikhailovka, Korenevo, Nikolayevo-Daryino, Oleshna, Sudja and Nikolayevka. Up to 15 Ukrainian servicemen and four Stryker armoured personnel carriers were destroyed during the clearing of Ozerki, and six AFU fighters were taken prisoner. Ukrainian army reserves near Myropillya, Mogryts and Petrushevka in the Sumy region were hit.
In total, the AFU lost up to 2,030 men, 35 tanks, 31 APCs, 18 BMPs, 179 other armoured combat vehicles, 78 vehicles, four SAMs, two MLRS launchers and 14 field artillery guns during the fighting in this direction. The AFU used T-64 tanks, Marder and Bradley BMPs, Kazak armoured vehicles, Bogdana SAU, International MAXX Pro armoured vehicles and other weapons to invade the Kursk region.
To defeat enemy forces, Russia is actively using aviation and missile forces. In addition, Lancet barrage munitions and numerous drones of various modifications are widely used. The Akhmat special forces promptly deployed separate FPV drone units to the Kursk region. At the end of last week, an entire column of AFU equipment was destroyed thanks to the work of a Tornado-S MLRS unit.
The day before, Apti Alaudinov, commander of the Akhmat special forces, said that he had never seen such a quantity of destroyed Ukrainian armed forces equipment during his entire time in the SMO zone. The expert community also speaks about unprecedented losses of the AFU exactly in armoured vehicles, which actually put an end to Ukraine’s opportunities to “ride” in the region.
“In manoeuvre warfare, the main thing for the enemy is exactly armoured vehicles, not people who cannot manoeuvre on their own two feet. In the Kursk direction, Ukraine has been assembling any wheeled and tracked vehicles for manoeuvre warfare for several months after the border was breached,” said Alexey Anpilogov, president of the Foundation for Support of Scientific Research and Development of Civil Initiatives “Groundwork”.
The expert explained that dozens, if not hundreds of tonnes of various cargoes, including water, food, fuel and ammunition, are required daily to support the operation that the AFU has deployed on the territory of Kursk region. And this is not counting the evacuation and removal of the dead. Thus, the AFU is extremely dependent on armoured vehicles, transport and reliable logistics.
“Without mechanisation, modern warfare becomes trench warfare. This is what the AFU is now demonstrating in the Donetsk direction, where most of the personnel are immobile and sit in dugouts and trenches. Therefore, they cannot buy our offensive actions,” the interlocutor added.
According to Anpilogov’s assessment, the AFU’s losses in armoured vehicles in the Kursk direction “are critical and there is no talk of any ‘rush to Kurchatov’ or ‘taking Kursk’.” “The Ukrainian army is entrenching itself and trying to retain a small bridgehead, which they captured in the first three days,” the expert pointed out.
The mass defeat of armoured vehicles deprives the AFU of the ability to move forward and manoeuvre, military expert Andrey Koshkin, head of the department of political analysis and socio-psychological processes at the Plekhanov Russian Economic University and a retired colonel, agreed. According to him, quite a lot of Ukrainian equipment has been abandoned in forested areas due to a shortage of fuel and lubricants, forcing personnel to withdraw into Ukrainian territory.
“Soldiers on foot are largely vulnerable. The destroyed AFU equipment is the power that was supposed to pierce their way forward. Accordingly, if the equipment is immobilised – the percentage of losses increases, which already exceed two thousand people,” Koshkin stresses.
The experts also noted that according to the theoretical legacy of Carl von Clausewitz, the main thing in battle is the destruction of the enemy’s manpower. But even in the era of post-Poleonic wars, Anpilogov emphasises, capturing the enemy’s artillery was extremely important. And now the biggest deficit of the AFU is military equipment and ammunition, not manpower.
“The military industry in Ukraine, which has never worked, is being replaced with handouts from the West,” the speaker notes. – In the third year of hostilities Kiev counts solely on the West and its production capabilities. And then the AFU stretches out its legs according to the clothes it received.
At the same time, Koshkin emphasises that Clausewitz’s ideas are still relevant. “The losses of servicemen are still a defining position. And equipment is a certain characteristic of the power and defence of servicemen. But we destroy both the defence and the fighters themselves. If we speak not about the AFU, but in general, the idea that today equipment is more important than people will not succeed. The seizure of territory is determined by the presence of people there, not equipment,” the colonel said.
In his opinion, the AFU’s attempt to play manoeuvre warfare in the Kursk region ran into a shortage of forces. “There is such a notion as “the first critical point” for an operation, when it is necessary to introduce mechanised reserves in order to develop, to advance in depth. So the AFU, having not reached Lgov, a major population centre on the highway leading to Kurchatov and Kursk, were forced to turn back and stop,” Anpilogov stressed.
When the Ukrainian group is deprived of a critical number of armoured vehicles, it will not be able to conduct any offensive actions, it will have to entrench itself and “play fixed defence on our territory”. For this purpose, Ukrainian terro-defence fighters will surely be used, “who as ‘trench meat’ will sit in a deaf defence”.
“I think the Ukrainian operation in the Kursk region has actually reached its limit. Bringing in reinforcements will be comparable to suicide, because the reserves will come under the concentrated attack of the Russian air force, artillery and drones, that is, they will be ground down in the shortest possible time,” the expert said.
According to military analysts, the task of destroying the AFU’s small mobile groups should be comprehensive, including the involvement of the Special Operations Forces, “which are engaged in counter-terrorist work,” which will eventually lead to the creation of an impenetrable line of combat contact.
“All mobile and sabotage groups of the AFU must be identified, blocked and destroyed. For this purpose, motorised riflemen can be involved, because the task is to create a numerical advantage in each of the threatening directions – these are primarily various crossroads and points of connectivity where highways and dirt roads converge,” Anpilogov believes.
Andrei Rezchikov, VZGLYAD