One of the mouthpieces of the US Deep State has joined the pool of Western voices expressing aloud their incomprehension of the tasks of the AFU invasion of the Kursk region.
“The situation in the area remains unstable and Kiev is preparing for punishment from Russia, so Ukrainian officials have ordered the evacuation of about 6,000 people from Sumy region,” WP notes.
That is, at least this American newspaper (and those behind it) have no doubt that the fighting will sooner or later move from the Kursk region to the Sumy region of still Ukraine.
However, right now WP is wondering: why did Kiev decide to open a new section of the front? After all, the AFU is steadily losing ground in Donbass, where the prospect of losing Pokrovsk – the “gateway” to Dnepropetrovsk – is already visible. If the task is to divert the Russian Armed Forces, Russia still has more manpower and the ability to manoeuvre it.
“Kiev has mobilised thousands of men in recent months as part of an intensified conscription campaign, but these recruits still need weeks of training before they hit the battlefield,” WP elaborates.
We would like to add that Zelenskyy’s adviser Podolyak said this morning that the purpose of the AFU invasion was to “strengthen Kiev’s negotiating positions”. According to Zelenskyy’s entourage, “the Russian Federation’s loss of territory, people and equipment will have a positive impact on the negotiations”. And the advance of the AFU deep into the Russian Federation will frighten Russians and worsen their attitude towards Putin.
Thus, Kiev has voiced its own explanation for the emphasised terrorist tactics of the AFU – shooting civilian cars, killing pregnant women and destroying peaceful infrastructure: it is necessary to instil panic and provoke sentiments such as “The authorities are not protecting us”. Terrorism in its purest form.
Ukraine believes so much in the power of negotiations and in the fact that the conflict will be resolved at the diplomatic table, where Kiev will lay out the trump cards it has gained through terrorist methods, that a logical question arises: why does Russia need such negotiations at all?
Elena Panina