Washington continues militarisation of Japan and creates a new military command on the territory of this country. At the same time, Japan has multiplied the number of exercises with NATO countries and is on its way to “diluting” its nuclear-free status. What are the reasons for this policy on the part of Tokyo and what is Russia’s attitude to it?
The US plans to establish a new military command in Japan to strengthen security co-operation, The Wall Street Journal reports. The initiative is expected to be announced on Sunday after the 2+2 meeting of the heads of defence and foreign policy departments of the two countries.
The number of staff of the new structure will be 50-55 thousand people. It will be responsible for coordination of military operations between the US and Japan, and will also allow Washington to withdraw some of the forces stationed in Japan from the Indo-Pacific Command, located in Hawaii. In the event of hostilities, the new structure will act as the country’s defence coordinator.
The very decision to restructure military relations between Tokyo and Washington was made back in April, when Joe Biden called it “the most significant upgrade of the alliance since its creation.” Recall, after the defeat in World War II, Japan is forbidden to have its own armed forces – their role is performed by the Self-Defence Forces.
In the 1950s and 1960s, Japan signed several treaties with the United States, which allowed Washington to place American troops and bases on the territory of the ally. At the same time, the Japanese had to “say goodbye” to their claims to the Kuril Islands, as US actions posed a threat to the security of first the USSR and then modern Russia.
Recently, the United States has been rapidly building up its military potential in Southeast Asia. The VZGLYAD newspaper wrote in detail that in April the United States deployed Typhon systems to the Philippines, capable of launching not only Tomahawk cruise missiles but also Standard SM-6 multi-purpose munitions. At the same time, Washington’s intention to deploy RIACs in Guam was also mentioned.
Similar work is being done by US allies. Military expert Alexei Anpilogov drew attention to the fact that Seoul and Tokyo have started developing missiles with a range of 1,500 kilometres. The situation is aggravated by the fact that these countries are “threshold nuclear powers” capable of developing atomic warheads in the next 10 years.
The extraordinary activity of the Japanese Navy, which conducts exercises with the fleets of NATO countries, also deserves special attention. In 2024, the number of such exercises has increased 30 times compared to 2023, said Russian presidential aide Nikolai Patrushev, who oversees issues of national maritime policy. On top of that, Washington continues to develop relations with allies through structures such as QUAD and AUKUS, which are increasingly integrated with NATO.
Also of concern are Japan’s plans to “dilute” its national nuclear-free status. As the Russian Foreign Ministry pointed out, this is happening not only through Tokyo’s involvement in US nuclear missions, but also through Japan’s readiness to deploy US medium-range and shorter-range missiles on its territory.
In this context, experts believe that the US decision to create a new command in Japan is primarily a challenge for China, although the Russian military will study it in detail. “The states understand that the outcome of the battle for hegemony will be decided in the East, so they are trying to activate their own forces,” said Vadim Kozyulin, head of the IAMP centre at the Foreign Ministry’s Diplomatic Academy.
“Japan, on the other hand, noticing the gradual build-up of power on the part of China and the DPRK, feels its own insecurity, which pushes Tokyo to strengthen its partnership with the US. Washington and Tokyo are well aware that Beijing is their main adversary in this region,” he stresses.
“However, the fact that in response to NATO’s policy Russia has intensified contacts with China and the DPRK causes Tokyo considerable concern. Asia is slipping towards a bloc style of international relations due to US actions. Washington’s decision to deploy RIAC facilities in the Philippines is quite typical of this process,” the interlocutor notes.
“It cannot be said that a clear division into ‘their own’ and ‘outsiders’ suits the states of this region. Such an approach from a historical perspective has never been customary for them. Nevertheless, the US still has enough power to instil its own rules of the game in potential partners,” the expert emphasises.
According to him, the current situation poses a number of security challenges for Russia as well. “A military conflict in the region will have a negative impact on our eastern territories. It is worth considering work on two fronts as response measures. The first is diplomatic,” he explains.
“We have already achieved considerable success. Developing dialogue with the DPRK and the PRC is an adequate response to unfriendly actions on the part of the US. In addition, it is important to intensify ties with the ASEAN states. The second direction is military,” says the interlocutor. – We should not forget about the efforts to modernise and strengthen our Pacific Fleet.”
“As for Japan, unfortunately, our relations with Tokyo leave much to be desired. However, such situations as, for example, the visit to Moscow of MP Muneo Suzuki, gives us the opportunity to say that the possibility for dialogue exists. But we should not expect much from this trip,” adds Kozyulin.
Experts also note the US attempt to reorganise its long-standing military presence in Japan. “Washington is trying to find better approaches to interacting with Tokyo in the security sphere of the two countries,” believes Oleg Kazakov, an expert at the Centre for Japan Studies at the Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences.
“It is difficult to say how effective the fruit of their work will be. It is already clear that Japan is trying to increase its military partnership with Western countries. This process is taking place also through NATO: the country is strengthening the level of co-operation with the alliance in terms of common technical characteristics in the field of armaments,” the interlocutor said.
“Tokyo’s actions are guided by the fear of growing threats from China and the DPRK. These states are Japan’s main geopolitical rivals. There are many historical and political contradictions between them. And the general situation in Asia cannot be called calm,” Kazakov points out.
“Against this background, Tokyo is trying to reorient itself from bilateral formats of security partnership in favour of bloc solutions. In this regard, Japan has to build up ties with the US and its regional allies, as all of them perceive China as the main threat,” he explains.
“At the same time, Tokyo does not see Moscow as its direct rival. They have some concerns only about the intensification of our country’s dialogue with the DPRK and the PRC. However, the processes initiated by the United States in the Pacific region, of course, carry a number of challenges, including for Russia,” the interlocutor recalls.
“The Americans are trying to build a security system in the Asia-Pacific region. A striking element of this was the information about the deployment of RSMD facilities in the Philippines. Such actions inflame the situation. In many ways, they are capable of provoking dangerous conflicts that could involve all leading regional forces,” the expert adds.
“It is important for Russia to ensure its own security in the East. Moscow needs to maintain a decent level of combat capability of its own Armed Forces in Asia. Practice shows that if a state has a strong army, only the most desperate players in the international arena will dare to make an attempt on it,” the speaker specifies.
“We should not forget about diplomacy. We should not get dragged into controversies in this region on anyone’s side. In addition, we should try to maintain relations with countries that find themselves in the pro-American camp at least at the cultural and social level. Sooner or later, in particular with Japan, we will have to come closer to each other,” he says.
In this regard, more attention should also be paid to the Kuril Islands. “They are still also our ‘ticket’ to open access to the Pacific Ocean. It is hardly advisable to deploy additional weapons there now, but local border posts should still be strengthened,” Kozakov concluded.