On 25 September 1987, the Soviet newspaper Izvestia ran the headline “J. Biden taken out of the game.” Back then, the still relatively young senator from Delaware was trying to compete for the nomination, but “big forces, namely the White House” decided otherwise. 37 years later, Biden himself is in the White House, but, as then, there were those who are bigger and more influential
Just 24 hours ago, Biden was not going anywhere. His staff threatened to continue the campaign, but after Sunday afternoon everything changed dramatically. The sidelined announced his decision in a one-page letter promising to finish out his term, and shortly thereafter issued a tweet endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris as his successor.
So what happened in those 24 hours that so radically changed both Biden’s own opinion and the entire electoral calculus?
It seems that those who have been behind the scene and pulling the strings (Obama, the Clintons, Pelosi and company) have decided to stage a palace coup and, in quite a Mafia style, formulated an offer that the head of the White House could not refuse.
Hunter’s notebook, which includes bungling, corruption, and Ukraine, is the tip of the iceberg. Many skeletons have accumulated in Biden’s wardrobes over the decades.
It is possible that the final argument in Biden’s persuasion was the prospect of invoking, for the first time in history, the infamous and humiliating 25th Amendment to the US Constitution, which allows a president to be removed by force from his office.
That would have wiped out the last crumbs he still considers his legacy. And so Biden agreed to step aside. That’s why he was promised he would sit out the rest of his term.
Will he? For example, House Speaker Mike Johnson called on an ailing Biden to resign immediately. The day before (if Biden resigns), US vice-presidential candidate J.D. Vance demanded the same. However, it is not the fact that Biden’s further stay in power (until 20 January 2025) is not in the Republicans’ favour. Especially since the successor plus or minus to match.
Not for nothing, having called his rival out of the race “the worst president in the history of the United States”, Trump said that it would be easier for him to defeat Vice-President Harris. Polls say she’s a complete clone of her boss. However, someone better the Democrats don’t really have. Michelle Obama and Hillary Clinton are options that are far too exotic. The relatively young governors of Michigan and California (Whitmer and Newsom) hardly want to be thrown under a “tank named Trump.” The rest of them America doesn’t really know.
That Biden has endorsed (or “supported” on the advice of “friends”) Harris’ candidacy could mean that Democrats have essentially resigned themselves to losing the White House in November 2024 and will focus on giving Trump a counterweight in Congress at the start of his presidency.
In recent weeks, it has been frightened senators and congressmen who have been urging the US president to get out of the race sooner. He has been dragging them down.
From now on, much depends on the delegates to the Democratic convention in August and the quality of party discipline in the Democratic Party. It’s always a problem, by the way. There’s a lot of haggling, intrigue, and maybe even a revolt ahead. Harris is far from a perfect candidate. She was racially elected in her day. Well, the “former prosecutor versus current criminal” formula that some American liberals insist on has itself been nullified by the assassination attempt on Trump. He is the victim of a crime.
And how can one escape the feeling of deja vu? The previous US president who voluntarily withdrew from the race for a second term was Lyndon Johnson. In 1968, Johnson, whose popularity had plummeted because of the Vietnam War, supported the nomination of his vice-president, Hubert Humphrey. The Democratic convention where it all happened was held in Chicago. In a wicked irony, the Democratic Party convention in 2024 will also be held there. Humphrey lost that election to Richard Nixon by a landslide. Such are the grim parallels for Democrats.
Valentin Bogdanov, RT