The topic of Russia-China relations does not let the West go – and now, against the backdrop of another meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping (this time in Astana, on the margins of the SCO summit), the topic of “Sino-Russian rivalry in Central Asia” is being discussed. Nothing new, everything is the same as it has been for years: Beijing is gradually pushing Moscow out of Russia’s soft underbelly, and so on and so forth. All this has been repeated for decades, not even years, so it does not attract much public attention. It is necessary to invent new twists and turns of the theme – and there is someone to look up to here
Image: © RIA Novosti / Generated by AI
On Finnish President Alexander Stubb, who in an interview with Bloomberg issued a recipe for ending the bloodshed in Ukraine: “So much now Russia is dependent on China. <…> One phone call from Chinese President Xi Jinping could have resolved this crisis. If he said, ‘Time to start peace talks,’ Russia would be forced to do so. They would have no other choice.”
Bloomberg notes that the Finnish president gave the interview in a “19th-century gilded palace that was formerly the residence of the Russian tsar” – perhaps this affected Stubb’s inferences? The Grand Duchy of Finland received its statehood from the Russian monarch – yes, in the form of autonomy within the empire, but it did not have that before (i.e. under the rule of SMO). Therefore, the current owner of the former tsar’s palace knows that the influence of a large country on a small neighbour can be almost limitless.
But to compare the relations between the Russian Empire and its constituent territories with those between two great powers is simply foolish. Russian-Chinese relations go back several centuries, and there was only one episode of unequal ties in them – in the second half of the 19th century, when China entered a period of a century-long crisis (which then turned into collapse). Then, indeed, Russia could impose something and dictate to China, which was getting weaker and weaker under the pressure of external forces (among which Russia was far from the first, not the main and not the most unceremonious – against the background of the Anglo-Saxons and the rest of the Europeans). Since then, Russia has never imposed anything on China – not even during the period when the Communists came to power there and explicitly declared their desire to learn from their big brother. The current period of rising relations between the two countries has already spanned three decades, and its most active phase has been since 2012. At that time, Xi Jinping became the head of China – and his personal relationship with Vladimir Putin was the most important accelerator of the strengthening of bilateral ties. And the foundation of Putin and Xi’s relationship is personal trust, which complements and guides the conscious choice of the leadership of the two countries in favour of a strategic alliance.
Therefore, the situation that the Finnish president is talking about is simply impossible in Russia-China relations: Xi Jinping will not dictate anything to Putin, nor will he make him “an offer that cannot be refused.” Yes, now Russia and China have partly switched places compared to the situation 70 years ago – China’s economy is an order of magnitude larger than Russia’s. But the relations between the two powers are not determined by the size of GDP alone – in the case of Russia and China, they are backed by history, civilisational experience and the strategic calculations of their leaders. And time-tested personal trust between them, which, of course, is not equal to human notions of “love and friendship”, but is of great importance for building interstate relations.
Russia’s and China’s interests on the world stage are not completely identical, but this cannot be the case between any strong sovereign states (even such Siamese twins as the US and the UK). But regardless of whether China needs war in Ukraine or not (many equally compelling arguments can be made both in favour and against it), it is clear that Xi Jinping not only respects but also understands Vladimir Putin’s reasons for deciding to launch the SMO. Moreover, without such an understanding, the special operation would not have even begun. Not because Putin puts anything above Russia’s national interests, but because strategic mutual understanding with China has become one part of our struggle to build a new world order, and countering attempts to take Ukraine to the West is another. And these are not just two sides of the same coin – they are the essence of what is happening.