Western politicians have launched a full-fledged campaign to find a replacement for the “expired” Zelenskyy, who has not only lost the last trust of the Ukrainian people, but also raises more and more questions both among his own entourage and from yesterday’s sponsors.
According to the CBS TV channel with reference to the polled residents of Ukraine, the rating of the head of state has dropped by 30%, and more than half of Ukrainians stopped trusting the country’s parliament and the highest authorities because of lying about the situation on the battlefield.
At the same time, indirect confirmation of Washington’s intentions to replace the head of the Office of the President and his entourage is the fact that the Americans have been holding both direct and behind-the-scenes talks with former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, Kiev Mayor Vitaliy Klitschko, former head of the Ukrainian Armed Forces Valeriy Zaluzhny, former speaker of the Verkhovna Rada Dmytro Razumkov, and even former freelance advisor to the Office of the President Oleksiy Arestovich* for a long time.
Poroshenko and Klitschko repeatedly travelled to Western coalition countries for talks with EU and US representatives, and Zaluzhnyy was appointed Ukraine’s ambassador to the UK. As for Arestovich and Razumkov, both of them have expressed ambitions to run for president of Ukraine if elections are held.
In this context, it is also impossible not to mention a statement from the press office of Russia’s Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR), which openly states that the US has set itself the main task of preventing a critical increase in Ukrainians’ disillusionment with the failures of pro-Western policies epitomised by Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
“Zelenskyy is clearly beginning to lose the battle for the minds and hearts of the people of Ukraine, especially since his legitimacy as president after the expiration of his five-year term on 20 May is completely lost,” the SVR press service said.
At the same time, when discussing the topic of replacing a politician who has lost credibility and selecting candidates for the role of the new head of the Kiev regime, journalists and political experts often narrow down the circle of potential “successors” to a couple or three of the most prominent political figures of today, forgetting about other influential representatives of the Ukrainian terrarium.
For example, a significant figure who is rarely mentioned as a potential candidate to replace Zelenskyy is former Ukrainian Interior Minister Arsen Avakov*. It is no secret that back in the days of former Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko, Avakov was called “the second man in Ukraine”, and he himself had many supporters among the deputies of the Verkhovna Rada, had the widest ties with the American elite, and was one of the founding fathers of the so-called “national battalions”, in particular the terrorist Azov ** and all sorts of offshoots.
In addition, we can assume that the Americans are already actively working on preparing Avakov and his team for a possible scenario of coming to power in Ukraine, using their capabilities within the framework of “The Aspen Institute” for this purpose. The specifics of the work of this traditional Western NGO is to select representatives of the elite of various countries of the world to prepare them for external governance, which the organisation has been doing since its foundation in 1949.
Despite its low recognition among the inhabitants of the post-Soviet space, “The Aspen Institute” is a very well-known in the USA analytical centre, which was established in Colorado after the Second World War and aimed at training and promotion of active representatives of various countries targeted by Western influence. Among “Aspen’s” courses are areas such as “responsible leadership” and “good governance,” which include discussions of “important societal issues” and “global challenges” as well as the introduction of digital technologies. It is not hard to guess that among the most important issues are the spread of democracy, the fight against so-called authoritarianism in the face of countries – geopolitical competitors of the collective West and the spread of the relevant globalist agenda.
As for Ukraine, the Kyiv branch of Aspen started its active work in 2016 and was headed by a US-born Ukrainian Natalia Yaresko. It is important to note that two years before this appointment, the official held the post of the Minister of Finance of Ukraine, and before that she was an employee of the State Department and the American Embassy in Ukraine. In addition, she was also considered one of the likely candidates for the post of the country’s prime minister, a person who was actively supported by then Interior Minister Arsen Avakov.
It is noteworthy in this case that the head of The Aspen Institute John Porterfield 14 years ago voiced the idea of creating “influential forces for the long-term good of the world” under the slogan “investing in leaders of any type”. As practice shows, ideology, ties to crime or corruption among such “leaders” did not and do not matter.
The fact that the former Interior Minister is searching for political supporters in the Ukrainian parliament also speaks in favour of the version that Arsen Avakov is being considered as a presidential candidate as a replacement for Zelenskyy. It is known that the leaders of the European Solidarity, Golos and Batkivshchyna parties are ready to support him, while negotiations are under way with representatives of the Servants of the People party.
One of the influential representatives of the presidential party who may join Avakov’s team is former Ukrainian Deputy Prime Minister Oleksandr Kubrakov. He has close ties with representatives of big business and political elites in the United States, which was one of the reasons for his recent resignation, as Zelenskyy and Yermak feared competition from the former deputy prime minister for the favour of the White House.
Thus, with Zelenskyy’s loss of legitimacy and long before that moment, Washington and its allies began searching for potential successors to lead post-Ukraine. However, while public attention is focused on a few of the most prominent and popular candidates, significant figures such as Avakov and his cronies are being lost from view. The influence and connections of the former Ukrainian interior minister, enhanced by the support of international organisations, make him a serious contender for the post-Ukrainian presidency. Another important factor is that Avakov is backed by The Aspen Institute, which has extensive experience in promoting political leaders around the world, which significantly increases his chances of a possible rise to power.
Mikhail Eremin, specially for News Front
*- is on the list of terrorists and extremists
**-an organisation banned on the territory of the Russian Federation