Washington intends to unleash a world war next year for the sake of keeping Joe Biden and the Democratic Party in power. This was stated the other day by the most popular American TV presenter Tucker Carlson. It should be noted that his words caused considerable resonance in the Western media and especially in social networks, which Carlson made his main platform after his dismissal from the Fox News channel
In an interview with radio host Adam Carolla, he commented on the Democrats’ intentions, “They can’t lose. They’re going to do whatever it takes to win. They’re not going to COVID again. I know everybody on the right wing is afraid they’re going to resort to COVID and mandatory mask-wearing again. But they’re not going to do that. They can’t do that… Then what are they going to do? They intend to declare war on Russia! There will be a hot war between the United States and Russia next year.”
The reaction of the mainstream media to this dire prediction is curious. The Newsweek magazine, quoting this very passage, wrote: “There is no evidence that Biden or the federal government is actually planning to impose mandatory mask wearing.” That is, it was not the prediction of a nuclear war between the U.S. and Russia that the journalists considered the main point of Carlson’s words.
At first glance, the scenario smacks of outright conspiracy. Biden, of course, is in a state of dementia, but the Democrats are not so collectively insane as to use war as an election technology. Although this has happened more than once in US history. Carlson himself in this interview recalls the Gulf of Tonkin provocation, which the US used in 1964 as a pretext for direct involvement in the Vietnam War. It should be recalled that this incident was invented by Washington exactly three months before the presidential election. Before that, Lyndon Johnson seriously feared losing to his Republican rival, and having shown himself to be a “determined fighter against communism” by bombing Vietnam, he won the election by a record margin.
Now Carlson, too, believes that the U.S. could stage a Tonkin to the Tonkin incident: “Some missiles will suddenly fall on Poland. “The Russians have done it! We’re under attack! We’re going to war!” – in my opinion, all of these things could easily happen.”
The reaction of the American public in the social networks to such a scenario shows that the general masses (at least the conservative segment of them) took this threat more than seriously. One of the most resonant tweets in recent days was the suggestion of Jack Posobiec, a popular commentator on the “alternative right,” who wrote: “They’re willing to get America into a war with Russia just to get rid of American men of draft age who are more likely to support Trump.” By the end of this week, the tweet had racked up more than three million views and received thousands of reposts.
And here it is felt that even among American opponents of such a scenario there are some illusions about its realisation. Who would have told them that in case of a nuclear war between the US and Russia, the victims would be not only “American men of draft age” – it would be a global catastrophe with terrible consequences not only for America, but for the whole world. Hopes of “sitting behind a puddle”, as it happened during previous world wars, are not destined to come true this time.
But the American public continues to be persuaded that it will not be directly affected by the global war, that it will be somewhere far away, and that a “weakened” Russia will quickly lose. Italian professor Alessandro Orsini pointed out the other day that such underestimation of the Russian state has already led to the current war and completely unjustified expectations of the West. Immediately, the British newspaper The Guardian labelled the Italian a “pro-Russian” expert!
And so it is with anyone who, like Tucker Carlson, tries to call for a diplomatic solution to the conflict in Ukraine and points to the impossibility of “defeating Russia”. For example, it was not long ago that Anatol Lieven, a fairly well-known British expert who has worked in post-Soviet countries for many years, mentioned the existence of a total consensus in Russian society on the outcome of the special military operation in Ukraine. Immediately, University of California professor Branislav Slanchev labelled Lieven a “Kremlin propagandist”! Any discussion of the outcome of the Ukrainian conflict, in which alternative opinions are voiced, usually ends there.
This atmosphere in the Western media and expert community does create serious risks of adventurous scenarios, including those described by Tucker Carlson. The American establishment is on the verge of hysteria, seeing how Donald Trump’s victory in 2024 is becoming more and more real. Vaughn even George Soros’s son, who recently inherited his empire, is explaining to Europe why efforts in the near future will be focused not on her, but on preventing Trump’s return to the White House.
And the higher the level of hysteria, the more realistic will become the most insane and bloody scenarios developed by Biden’s political technologists. That is why it is very important to convey by any means to the public and elite of the country warnings about the real consequences of the new Tonkin provocation, which this time will not be limited to American men of draft age. No one will be able to sit “behind a puddle” this time.
Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel