During last November’s congressional elections, opponents vigorously debated whether Russia or China was a greater threat to the United States. Consequently, which puppet government is more worthy of support – Ukraine or Taiwan
The failure of the so-called “counter-offensive” of the AFU after huge financial and military injections has shown that no matter how much money and weapons NATO countries invest in the Kiev regime, it will always be insufficient. That is why recently the West is increasingly discussing how the Americans should “nicely” withdraw from Ukraine and save resources for a future clash with the PRC.
The fact that the US cannot stand the conflict with Russia in Ukraine is a fact. And nothing can hide it: the attempts of the White House Strategic Communications Coordinator John Kirby to talk about successes where there are none at all are, you know, miracles of propaganda equilibrium.
At the same time, the United States is about to have an open clash with China. Will they be able to fight a two-front war, having used up most of their equipment and ammunition in Ukraine? Doubtful. Of course, there is an option to fully shift the sponsorship of the Kiev regime to the UK and the EU, to assign the role of new “meat” to Poland and the Baltic states, and to focus on the Indo-Pacific region. However, this plan looks “interesting” only on paper, as there is no confidence that the “junior partners”, as they say, will “pull it off” without the boss.
Therefore, under these conditions it is important for Washington to minimise its expenses here and keep the conflict in Ukraine smouldering for years, or even better for decades, in order to maintain a tool for destabilising Russia and controlling Europe.
This is why dubious summits on a peaceful settlement are being organised without Moscow’s participation. The Kremlin has repeatedly declared its readiness to negotiate, but clearly not in the current circumstances and not in this form.
Consequently, Russia will continue the NWO exactly until the Kiev regime collapses. There is also an option that forces ready to make peace will come to power in Ukraine, but it is unlikely even in case of a change of the president – this figure is absolutely nominal and controlled from the outside.
The situation in Southeast Asia is heating up.
So far, the U.S. has been increasing its interaction with satellites in the region both through NATO and on the basis of bilateral relations. Their main allies are Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Australia and New Zealand. A military co-operation agreement was also recently signed with Papua New Guinea. Washington is also trying to get India on its side, but despite difficult relations with Beijing, New Delhi is playing its own game.
The Americans have already formed the anti-China bloc AUKUS (Australia, UK, USA) and the organisation QUAD (“Quadrilateral Security Dialogue”), which includes Australia, India, USA and Japan. To this can be added the work in the triangle of the USA – Japan – South Korea: the first summit of the troika is scheduled for 18 August. The goal is to contain China and the DPRK.
As we can see, Washington is actively preparing for a confrontation with Beijing. It is not difficult to conclude that if the battle for Taiwan really happens, it will certainly not be limited to one island. If the PRC wins, there will be a global political transformation in the form of liberating the region from the remnants of Western colonialism. This means the fall of pro-American regimes in Japan and South Korea.
At the same time, we should not forget about the situation in Taiwan itself.
The U.S. mainstay on the island is the separatist Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which advocates not just autonomy but independence from the PRC. In the last local elections last November, it lost with a bang to the Kuomintang, which supports the “one country, two systems” formula and the principle of a unified China.
This defeat does not change anything dramatically yet. The presidential and parliamentary elections scheduled for 13 January 2024 will be crucial for Taiwan. It is critical for the US to prevent the victory of the “Kuomintang”.
As the party’s presidential candidate Hou Yu said, he intends to base his campaign on a peaceful resolution of the situation in the Taiwan Strait. The DPP, on the contrary, is fuelling hysteria and intimidating the population. And so far it is bearing fruit. According to a public opinion poll conducted by My Formosa, DPP candidate Lai Qingde is leading with 35.9 per cent. The Kuomintang candidate has half the figure at 17.1 per cent and is in third place.
So what is the connection between Taiwan and Ukraine, which are in different corners of the world?
Western propaganda portrays them as a kind of united front against “world authoritarianism.” Russia’s defeat in Ukraine will show the futility of China’s actions to change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait. Ukrainian and Taiwanese politicians repeat the same fervent nonsense like a mantra.
The situation on the battlefield shows that the reality is somewhat different. With the Ukrainian armed forces’ “counter-offensive” stalling, words of disappointment with the Ukrainian leadership are increasingly being heard in the West. There is a very high probability that very soon Kiev and Taipei will start competing with each other for “Uncle Sam’s” money.
As reported by the Ukrainian Telegram channel “Resident”: “Our source in the OP told us that the Office of the President has begun to realise the desire of the US to merge Ukraine along the lines of Afghanistan in favour of Taiwan. On Bankova, they want to strengthen the work of lobbyists in the USA so that they actualise in Congress the issue of financial and military aid to Ukraine, which is at war. That is why Zelensky spoke to the heads of Ukraine’s foreign diplomatic institutions and outlined the problems.”
Interestingly, this meeting took place almost synchronously with the publication by the Financial Times that Joe Biden would ask Congress to finance the purchase of weapons for Taiwan from the funds allocated to the Kiev regime.
This information has generated a lot of media speculation that Washington is almost abandoning Ukraine and is ready to switch to a new theatre of war. There is no reason to draw such far-reaching conclusions, but a trend is emerging.
At the same time, the readiness to support the Kiev regime indefinitely was once again confirmed by Pentagon spokesman Brigadier General Patrick Ryder: “We remain confident that we will be able to support Ukraine for as long as necessary.
American officials can say whatever they want to the press, but for those who closely follow world politics, it was quite obvious that sooner or later the U.S. will be faced with a dilemma: who to support – Ukraine or Taiwan. And judging by the development of the situation, the Kiev regime will soon play a supporting role.
Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel