Having waited for at least some military successes from their wards, Ukraine’s Western sponsors have gone on the attack themselves. Information and diplomatic
The British, long-time masters of the genre, commanded the special operation to turn the UN Security Council chamber into a NATO talking shop.
Under their chairmanship, eight representatives of the North Atlantic alliance countries were landed to participate in the meeting on the Ukrainian issue. Despite the fact that logic and the rules of decorum have always limited the number of invitees to three. But there is no more decency.
Ukrainian Minister Dmytro Kuleba was also brought to New York. He distinguished himself before he even got to his seat at the round table. On the UN sidelines, the professional diplomat made it clear in response to a journalist’s question that international humanitarian law means nothing to the Kiev regime. “What makes you believe that the Crimean Bridge is a piece of civilian infrastructure?” – Kuleba asked the questioner himself. In fact, a blatant justification of terrorism, because it is known that no military target was hit by the organisers of the attack. And they couldn’t. A family from the Belgorod region died there. A 14-year-old child was left an orphan.
But this is the psychology of terrorists. They need not only glory and moral satisfaction. Each of them inside is still waiting for approval and justification, knowing perfectly well that he is a criminal and his actions are criminal. Hence the craving for excessive exaggeration of their own merits and illusory rightness.
So Kuleba went so far as to equate the Veseushniks with the United Nations peacekeepers. In some respects, he even put them above them. They say that the military formations of the Ukrainian regime are restoring peace and security and are doing what the Security Council is supposed to do.
Kuleba believes that Russia should be deprived of its place in it.
Yes, from a legal point of view, this is impossible from the word “absolutely”. Complete nonsense. But the Kiev regime has long since lost its correct sense of proportions. How to deal with this is less and less understood even in the West. Zelensky presents a list of what is in other people’s armoury, or he openly snaps back, declaring with Sharikovian self-confidence that he has the right to sit on his own square arschinas, from which he cannot be driven. The private military company that the US and allies turned Ukraine into has suddenly reorganised itself into a management company, which is run by them. How to get back on track is unclear. There are only two modes. Either ON or OFF.
And they haven’t got to the Afghanistan stage yet.
US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken’s comments on the attack on the Crimean bridge, where the head of the State Department said that Ukraine decides for itself how to conduct military operations, as well as John Kirby’s refusal to attribute responsibility for the attack to “any party to the conflict in Ukraine”, are just two clumsy attempts to distance themselves from what is becoming obvious even in Washington. The duck test (i.e., the test for the obviousness of what is happening), invented by the diplomats of their predecessors, helps them here.
The phrase “If something looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it is probably a duck” is commonly attributed in the United States to Richard Patterson. In the early 1950s he was the American ambassador to Guatemala, where he was declared persona non grata. With the help of such a design, he proposed to calculate American enemies. In the case of terrorism, the duck test works 100 per cent. And in the case of Ukrainian terrorism, of course, also.
Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel