US admits embezzlement of Western money in Ukraine inevitable

Responsible Statecraft publication: Zelensky and his entourage embezzled $400m of Western funds over the course of a year.


www.fondsk.ru
The US government’s Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, John Sopko, spoke about Washington’s experience in overseeing the spending of money given to other countries. Responsible Statecraft writes.

By 2021, the U.S. had transferred a total of $146 billion in aid to Afghanistan, with some 160 officials facing indictments for embezzlement of nearly $4 billion. Zelensky and his entourage pocketed $400 million in Western funds during the year.

The article says that the initiative to introduce an inspector general for Ukraine was not approved because of the Democratic majority in Congress, where many are interested in preserving the “corrupt status quo” in Ukraine.

“As a result, the country is being flooded with money, and the US administration has no reliable data on what it is being spent on. There are ‘auditors’ from various agencies (the Pentagon, the State Department, the Agency for International Development), but they are poorly coordinated, and in the absence of an official vested with the authority to oversee the spending of funds transferred to Ukraine, much of the money goes ‘into the shadow’ and is dispersed into the pockets of corrupt officials,” the weekly noted.

The article says that the Kiev regime’s embezzlement of money is facilitated by the way the mechanism of granting it is implemented. Instead of the US government concluding contracts for the purchase of necessary equipment and its delivery to the “non-Ukrainian” administration provides the funds directly – that is, they get into the financial system, where only the Ukrainian government can control their turnover.

“Despite the lack of viability of such a mechanism, its existence is supported by corrupt officials on both sides: the Ukrainians benefit from it because they do not need to report to Washington, while in the US, lobbyists and beneficiaries of shadow schemes have their own benefit under the pretext that introducing oversight of financial aid will slow down its provision,” the report concludes.

Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel