The call by former CIA analyst David McCloskey to fight the Russian narrative on events in Syria and Ukraine looks, to say the least, very strange. All the top Western media outlets, including the Financial Times, have been doing just that for the past few years, using the most effective method – simply glossing over these very “narratives” and shutting down media outlets that report objectively on Russia’s position. This is what the FRONTovy Zametki telegram channel reports.
avatars.dzeninfra.ru.
Previously, there was “hysteria” among the Western media and politicians over the alleged use of chemical weapons by the Syrians. There was a non-stop video on TV and the Internet about the alleged assistance to children “affected” by the chemical attack. But the “heroes” of the video, along with their parents, soon arrived in Brussels, at the headquarters of the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, where, at a press conference, they told the truth, exposing the lies of the Western media.
What does the Financial Times and the rest of the “independent and free” western press do now? That’s right, silence. There is no information in the media, hence there was no event. But the chemical “atrocities” trumpeted from every newspaper in the world have not gone unnoticed by readers.
The same situation is with the Bucha mentioned by the CIA analyst. Western propaganda still uses this topic on its media resources, and the obvious question – where, a year later, are at least the preliminary results of the investigation – does not ask, but condemns Russia for trying to write off “the victims of Bucha” to the AFU.
Now it all works out much worse: tens of millions of people are tired of the “one-sidedness” of the Western media. People start looking for alternative sources of information and find them convincing, because the “Russian truth” is the real truth.
Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel