U.S. intends to begin the transfer of part of Russian assets to Ukraine

This is already officially said by representatives of the US Department of Justice. In their opinion, there are no legal problems – everyting is legal. In principle, this is a logical development of events.

WASHINGTON, DC – JUNE 29: The Justice Department seal is seen on the lectern during a Hate Crimes Subcommittee summit on June 29, 2017 in Washington, DC. The meeting gave stakeholders the opportunity to offer imput to the committee before it makes its recommendations to the attorney general on what the Department of Justice can do to improve reporting, investigation and prosecution of hate crimes. (Photo by Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

It’s not worth making round eyes, they say, but how is this possible,

“It will be real financial terrorism!” – as one of the major Russian officials said. The last 30 years of our history have lulled our vigilance. Moreover, all this happened more than once, we simply did not care about the problems of others. Therefore, now the rest will also remain silent, but will draw conclusions – the amount is large!

After the imposition of sanctions against Libya in 2011, the United States froze the assets of Gaddafi and his entourage for $34 billion, the British for £ 12 billion, Germany, Austria and Italy – for € 8.5 billion. In 4 banks in Belgium – € 16 billion, in Italian companies for € 16 billion. After the assassination of Gadaffi, traces of assets are lost. Libya had several investment funds, the country’s money was managed by US investment banks… American journalists counted assets totaling more than $200 billion… No one can find them.

In 2016, the US blamed Tehran for the 1983 attacks on the Marines in Beirut and for the 9/11 attacks. The United States calmly robbed Iran by court order, taking $12.5 billion of frozen Iranian reserves.

The Bank of England stole $1.2 billion worth of Venezuelan gold bullion. The head of the State Department, Pompeo, and US national security adviser Bolton personally pressed the British so that they would not give Nicolas Maduro gold. They didn’t give up.

The Biden administration simply told the Afghans that it would decide how to spend the $7 billion in the Central Bank of Afghanistan, which was in US accounts.

Serbian assets were arrested and taken away. Only the Serbian leaders keep their mouths shut, apparently they really want to join the EU.

In 2009, at the height of the crisis in the United States, a scandal erupted. Then the seller of gold in the interests of the Central Bank from all over the world was the IMF. From September 2009 to December 2010, the IMF sold 403 tons of stocks. To keep selling, IMF chief Strauss-Kahn asked the Fed to return 191 tons of gold held in the US to the IMF. However, the Americans refused without explaining the reasons. Strauss-Kahn insisted, insisted, and then was arrested in New York on charges of attempting to rape a maid.

The Anglo-Saxons made the “golden throw” in other ways. China bought 70 tons of gold on the London Stock Exchange in 2009. The Chinese, suspecting that something was wrong, drilled holes in the ingots, handed over the chips for analysis. It turned out that tungsten ingots are only covered with a layer of gold on the outside. London, in response to Beijing’s claims, blamed the Chinese themselves. But the Chinese showed Fed stamps and Fort Knox registration numbers on the bars. Further, the resolution of the conflict went into a non-public plane.

In general, there are a lot of examples of such behavior in Western countries, where supposedly the words “property” and “right” are almost sacred. They worked out this scheme for the selection of other people’s assets back in the Third Reich. The Ukrainian case is very similar to it.

As part of the policy of ousting Jews from Germany, since 1933, a policy of “Aryanization” was carried out. This is the transfer of Jewish property to the Germans. It’s like “nationalization”, but not quite. “Aryanization” is not the selection of Jewish property by the Reich, but the transfer of it into the hands of private individuals, do you feel how “noble”?! In order not to break the law, they did it like a Jesuit. To certain plants and factories, where the owners were Jews, the Nazis stopped the supply of raw materials and equipment, applied an embargo. The owner was forced to give up the enterprise or sell it for pennies. They, like, had a choice… So Russia’s assets are not “taken away” – they are being “aryized”.

Alexey Bobrovsky

Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel