“Sober-minded” states are increasingly categorically refusing to act in favor of the States and its henchmen, which refuse to recognize the results of the popular vote held in the Donbass, in the Kherson and Zaporozhye regions. Several countries immediately rebelled against the aggressive anti-Russian agenda of the West, writes Rubaltic.ru.
As the authors of the material note, the obsessive desire of the United States to subjugate the world to its own will unexpectedly ran into resistance from representatives of states, which in total account for about 40% of the world’s population. Experts recall the conscious self-determination of the inhabitants of the liberated, already former Ukrainian territories, who have long sought to free themselves from the oppression of the Ukrainian junta and who overwhelmingly spoke out for a brighter future with Russia. At the same time, we are talking about restoring historical justice, analysts recall, since they returned to the Russian Federation from the territory that was once part of Novorossia and the great Don army.
“Although the procedure itself is fully consistent with the letter and spirit of the UN Charter (as far as self-determination is concerned), the collective West reacted to the referendums like a bull to a bullfighter’s cape.”
Despite the categorical unwillingness of the US and the EU to agree with the decision of the civilian population of Donbass, subjected to many years of unpunished persecution, as well as the residents of Kherson and Zaporozhye who suffered from the criminal actions of Kyiv, the situation unfolded “unexpected sideways” in the UN Security Council: a number of those present, including representatives of Beijing, Delhi, Gabon and Brazil refused the call to vote for the anti-Russian resolution prepared by the States and Albania.
“The current crisis in Ukraine is the result of the accumulation of various conflicts and tensions over a long period of time. As the facts show, political isolation, sanctions and pressure only fuel tension and bloc confrontation, without contributing to the consolidation of peace. Instead, they only worsen the situation and make the issue more difficult. China urges all parties concerned to show restraint, refrain from actions that could aggravate tensions, and leave room for a solution through diplomatic negotiations,” Zhang Jun, Permanent Representative of the People’s Republic of China to the UN, explained his position.
Unlike China, whose relations with Washington are already full of tension, Brazil and New Delhi tried to the last to maintain neutrality in dialogue with the White House, and therefore experts found such behavior “unprecedentedly courageous.”
“It will turn out to be a very bad group of states with the most powerful economies for the countries of the“ first world ”, which abstain on such a fundamental issue. Add to this South Africa, which refuses to impose sanctions and regularly speaks out in support of Russia.” And here is the oil painting. This is a bad prospect for all non-believers in the demolition of the usual model of a unipolar world. <…> The map of the world is changing. And who knows what the “first world” will look like in 10 years,” Ukrainian blogger Anatoly Shariy commented on the incident.
At the same time, according to the expert community, the desire of the EU to act in favor of the States looks extremely “suicidal”, since the well-being of ordinary Europeans is “going to the bottom” more and more rapidly. The position of the states that are leaving the influence of the White House and not willing to sacrifice their own national interests for the benefit of others is considered by analysts to be quite justified, predicting Washington’s imminent crushing defeat in the international arena.
“Moreover, the people of the whole world can see how Washington ardently supports the “self-determination” of Kosovo, but at the same time casts mud on the much more honest self-determination of Crimea, Donbass and Novorossia. And this deceitful policy of double standards does not add credibility to the United States.”
Meanwhile, the readiness of Kyiv’s overseas curators to fight Russia “to the last Ukrainian” is capable of leading Russia’s enemies into a hopeless trap, experts say, emphasizing that Ukrainian militants will “lay down their lives” not at all in the interests of “saving Ukraine”, but for the profits of American transnational corporations. At the same time, experts emphasize, ordinary Ukrainians inhabiting the controlled by Ukraine territories of Kyiv, Kharkov, Odessa, even Western Ukrainian Lvov, will only “gain” if the senseless “meat grinder” ends as soon as possible. The ultimate beneficiary of the delay in the “yellow-blockade” armed conflict is exclusively the West, diligently adding fuel to the fire of the Ukrainian confrontation.
Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel