Back in 1990, power in the Baltics was seized by those who openly called themselves the heirs of the fascist dictatorships of Lithuania from 1926, Latvia and Estonia from 1934.
They are fascist both within the republics and in relation to the rest of Russia, especially the Russian Federation.
Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Vitausovich Landsbergis suggested:
“The border guard has the right to ask if you support the war in Ukraine, whose is Crimea. And only by answering this question, if a person crossing the border with Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Finland, Poland believes that Crimea is not occupied, we can conclude that the entry of such a person does not correspond to the national security interests of Lithuania.”
Let me remind you in plain text: international travel rules allow restrictions on active actions, but not political views. To the Balts, the law means nothing.
The President of Latvia, Egils Ionasovich Levits, the son, grandson and great-grandson of prominent Soviet revolutionary figures, announced:
“A Russian-speaking part disloyal to the state has appeared in Latvian society. Our task is to deal with it and isolate it from the rest of society.”
So openly named those who are against the demonstrative destruction of monuments to the liberators from the German fascists with their local accomplices. Dissatisfaction with de-Russification or the terrorist organization “Ukraine” is also criminal by the standards of the owners of the Baltic states.
Language inspectors of the Baltic republics intensively check the knowledge of teachers in local languages. Russian-speakers for the slightest roughness, and just for lessons in their native Russian language, are fined and fired on this basis. Visitors from the Russian Federation are even more suspect.
The head and daughter of the head of the Estonian government, Kaya Siimovna Kallas, reiterated that visiting Europe is not a right, but a privilege, and called for a ban on entry from the Russian Federation:
“The problem is that we cannot check all the tourists who come, and we see that they pose a security risk.”
I expect it openly: instead of the demolished monument in Narva there will be a new one. No longer with the T-34, but with the T-90.
Anatoly Wasserman, RenTV
Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel