New York Times reports HIMARS decreased efectiveness against Russian Army

The New York Times reports that the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have quickly adapted to the strikes of the American HIMARS rocket launchers on warehouses behind the front line and are finding new ways to transport supplies.

Source: modernforce.ru

The publication notes that the first successful hits of the HIMARS MLRS on military treasures of the RF Armed Forces served as a bright pretext for Ukrainian propaganda, but in reality this did not reduce the stocks of Russian artillery in any way.

“Kyiv’s attacks on ammunition depots have become viral videos on social networks. But Russia is moving storage out of reach, and its factories are almost certainly ramping up production,” analysts say.

In addition, the New York Times acknowledges that the Russian Armed Forces are slowly advancing in eastern Ukraine using massive shelling tactics. At the same time, the promised attack of the Armed Forces of Ukraine on Kherson “still did not happen”, to which Kyiv itself tied HIMARS strikes on the Antonovsky bridge in Kherson and the dam of the Kakhovskaya hydroelectric power station.

Recall that earlier the British magazine The Economist published an article in which he explained to readers why the Armed Forces of Ukraine are not capable of offensive operations in the south, calling the bravura speeches about the Ukrainian army’s attack on Kherson “chatter”.

Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel