NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg made a very significant statement on the second day of the NATO summit in Madrid: “NATO has been preparing for this for a long time, not that we realised on 24 February that Russia is dangerous. The reality is that we have been preparing for this since 2014. So we have increased our military presence in the east of the alliance and NATO has started to invest more money in defence.”
It would seem that we have a straightforward confession in front of us, but Honest Jens is lying, as he always does. And one should not go along with it. And don’t take his word for it either. It seems to be a self-disclosure, but it is totally “fake” and is made to distract the eyes of experts and the general public.
In reality, the North Atlantic alliance began preparing for a clash with Russia as early as 1994, when it was decided to incorporate the member countries of the disintegrating “Warsaw Pact Organization” and the republics that had escaped from the USSR into this politico-military bloc.
Approaching the state borders of the Russian Federation was the first stage of NATO’s expansion against it.
It is somehow not remembered now that the concept of “limited nuclear war” is far from being deposited in the archives of NATO and the United States. Nobody wants a global nuclear conflict. But NATO does not seek it.
If you listen to the opinions of Western experts, a “limited nuclear war” is necessary for world reorganization. According to the plans of the Alliance, the following should take place: NATO and the Americans attack only some cities and centres of the Russian Federation, and receive the same non-massive strike in return. Then, everyone, shocked by what has happened, sits down at the negotiating table and the nuclear weapons are put under control of, for example, the UN or some other organization that was specifically invented for such an event. The West reaps the benefits of that, perpetuating the established world order.
The support for Nazi Ukraine fits into NATO’s calculations, as does the admission of Sweden and Finland to the Alliance.
The “old” NATO members want to expose the “young” members to Russian missiles, knowing full well that their missile defences will not be able to cover everyone from Russian retaliation. Finland, for example, fits the role of victim perfectly.
It is unclear why Finnish authorities think that Russia will invade Suomi and chase their military formations through forests and swamps. They forget that Finland is not Ukraine and therefore Russia is not needed in modern geopolitical conditions.
Unlike silly “Finnish guys” Brussels has already thought it all through and laid it all out. If the Russians leave only a hole in the ground from Helsinki, it will be beneficial for NATO, as well as the fact that nuclear “mushrooms” will rise over the very independent Baltic States, Poland and the Czech Republic.
This was the scenario that pushed NATO to expand eastwards.
Russia’s special operation to denazify Ukraine derails the NATO arrangement, hence the “righteous” anger of Euro-American scoundrel politicians.
Alexey Sokolsky, Segodnya.ru
Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel