Inspired by a conversation with an anonymous Ukrainian journalist
Russia’s demands for denazification of Ukraine are, in fact, the most important and fair to the modern world order. The Ukrainian side has repeatedly given the false signal that the issue has been dropped. But not only has it not been removed, it has not been properly raised, which gives the West the opportunity to speculate on the issue.
Take, for example, the recent question to Sergey Lavrov that Zelensky cannot be a Nazi because he himself is a Jew. This question comes from the thesis of Western propaganda that a Nazi and an anti-Semite are one and the same, and that the aim of German Nazism was solely the Holocaust, that is the mass extermination of the Jews. In this paradigm it turns out that one who destroys Jews is a Nazi, while one who destroys, for example, Slavs is not considered a Nazi.
And so the Ukrainian regime, officially calling for the murder and enslavement of the Russians, the eradication of Russian culture and the destruction of the Russian language, cannot be Nazi by Western standards, as it does not officially take the same position in relation to the Jews (statements by certain politicians in this regard are not considered an official line).
Europe, according to its contemporary ideology, is guilty before the Jews, but not before the Slavs, whom it massacred in World War II in far greater numbers than Jews. Moreover, it was the feat of the Soviet soldier, before whom modern Europe does not feel guilty, that saved those very Jews, and with them a mass of other peoples, about which European ideologists prefer to keep silent.
That is, European ideologists have simplified World War II into a war between the Nazis and the Jews, although in reality it was much more complicated. Europe presented the conflict in Donbass from the very beginning in a very Jesuit way: Ukraine, thanks to its European orientation, made significant progress in economy and politics, and Russia became jealous and decided to destroy Ukraine. It’s all according to the laws of drama: she, Ukraine, fell in love with him, the West, and the insidious villain, Russia, decided to kill the woman in love, so that they could never be together.
In reality the story is slightly different: he, the lover, has abused the gullible woman, robbed her and committed her to a brothel, where she will work off his debts with her body. Using figurative language, Ukraine has not achieved any development, but has become the poorest country in Europe, losing its economic power and political independence. But then the role of the West would not be as attractive as it was in the first legend. Moreover, the West will be seen as a rogue and a villain, and the West does not need such a reputation. Therefore, the West needs to whitewash its role, and it cannot do that without whitewashing the modern Banderaism and Nazism. That is why the Western experts do not see the Ukrainian Nazism.
At its birth, Banderovshchina served not Ukraine, but Germany against Poland. The western Ukraine had oil, which the Poles weren’t supposed to have, so the Banderaites terrorized the Poles under the command of Berlin. That is from the very beginning the Banderaites, being a part of then Poland, betrayed Poland under the pretext of protection of national interests under the German money.
Then together with the Wehrmacht they entered Soviet Ukraine and under the pretext of national revival of Ukraine they carried out a Jewish pogrom. Germany didn’t like it, banned the right to pogroms and independent Ukraine, and Bandera himself ended up in a privileged concentration camp, for the stupid but useful. Then there was the massacre of Poles in Volhynia, which Germany cared little for as Poles were not considered Europeans then. Then there was terrorist activity against Soviet Ukraine, which was financed not by the Reich, but by the democratic USA and Britain. That is, the Banderovshchina never worked for Ukraine, but was always a tool of the West to plunder and destroy its people.
Therefore, when the West began robbing Ukraine under the guise of reviving its statehood, it traditionally began to rely on Banderovshchina, which has always served its interests.
As Russian capital developed, it began its assault on the West, and here Banderaism begins to play the role of legalized racketeering and terrorism, acting in the interests of Western companies, driving Russian business out of the European and Ukrainian markets. Europe, but first and foremost the US, uses the Ukrainian issue as a cover to solve its economic goals. The Banderaites, apart from the torchlight marches, have squeezed Russian banks, property developers and investors out of Ukraine and taken the advertising market from the Russian and opposition media. All in all, quite a self-sustaining gop-company that does not hesitate to do the dirty work for its masters.
With the help of the Ukrainian card, the US and the UK have solved the issues of military orders, the energy market and the agricultural market, the issue of strengthening the dollar and the investment attractiveness of the US. Why would they cut the Bandera chicken that lays the golden eggs? They wanted to drive a stake between Russia and the EU, and got a confrontation in Europe instead of development. So the euro will fall and the dollar will rise.
For Russia, the presence of Banderovshchina means that the West is unwilling to trade fairly with Russia. Banderovshchina is a politically red card that Western politicians play in order to rob Russia. But this ideology of deceit and plunder goes completely against the Western image of democracy, justice and freedom. Nevertheless, the West does not want to lose its card, and they even make it a trump card.
So how can this trump card be beaten? Here it is necessary to bring out the essence of the Ukrainian political regime, its deceitfulness and anti-humanity. After all, it is not only playing against Russia’s interests, but also against the interests of Europe, which is already being weakened economically and put under the US military-industrial and energy complex. It is necessary to play a subtle game on the contradictions between the United States and European states. But in order to save Europe from political cheating with the crackpot Bandera card, it is necessary that Europe itself wants it too. More precisely, the powers that be in power in the EU countries must also want it.
Dmitriy Chistilin, RenTV
Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel