The US military at the official level may enter into a conflict in Ukraine with the Russian Armed Forces
A corresponding resolution has been submitted to the US Congress, providing for the authorization of the use of military force and giving President Joe Biden the right to use the army against Russia “in the event of the use of nuclear, biological or chemical weapons in Ukraine.” Well, and how the Americans find weapons of mass destruction where they do not exist and never have been, we all know from the famous test tube of Colin Powell and the war in Iraq that followed.
The author of the insane document that opens up the possibility of a global nuclear war is a former military pilot who bombed Iraq and Afghanistan, Republican Adam Kinzinger. He became famous for becoming one of the few members of the US Republican Party who voted for the impeachment of Donald Trump, and therefore, in the fall elections, he does not even have the slightest chance of re-election and ends his political career. Apparently, the congressman does not care what will happen to the planet after he leaves politics, and therefore puts forward suicidal resolutions.
“No, absolutely not! This is insane,” writes fellow Republican and U.S. Air Force veteran Buzz Patterson, who in the last election challenged the Democrats in a California district that his party has not won since the 1950s.
“A big NO to this. Kinzinger is a puppet of the establishment,” proclaims Josh Barnett, a congressional candidate from the same Republican party in Arizona. And there are many such voices in America now – at least someone still understands the risk of catastrophe in the event of a direct clash between two nuclear powers.
But few people listened to the “arguments” that Kinzinger gave as a justification for his crazy initiative. Perhaps it is worth quoting the congressman verbatim here:
“We know that millions of Ukrainians have been displaced, thousands have been killed, and the damage that continues to be inflicted on them is absolutely inhuman. Attacks on civilians, mass executions and countless reports of rape by the Russian military have largely gone unchecked. We must take action to put an end to these atrocities”.
Just think about these words of an official communication from a member of the US Congress. The following theses appear in one row: “we know”, “messages have not been checked” (that is, “we don’t know anything for sure”), “put an end to atrocities”. Well, why is it not all the same Powell test tube? Kinzinger admits that all reports of “Russian atrocities” are a set of unfounded (that is, fake) accusations, nothing more. And we understand what will happen when the media, spreading unverifiable Russophobic lies, declare “the use of chemical weapons by Russia” (and such attempts have already been made a few days ago), even regardless of the fact that we have no such weapons for a long time. Kinzinger will instantly declare that “unverified” reports provide grounds for the introduction of the American army into Ukraine.
We emphasize that we are talking about the official entry of the United States into the war. There is little doubt that the American military is already in Ukraine at an unofficial level. Last week, we received factual confirmation of this when Washington first acknowledged the death of “22-year-old Marine Corps veteran” Willie Kansel in Ukraine. It is clear that the word “veteran” in America is used a little differently than we do, and refers to any former military man. But at the age of 22, to finish the service in the Marine Corps and immediately go to serve in a PMC – this is not often seen. It can be omitted that Cancel did not leave the service. Moreover, a few months ago, the Pentagon categorically denied the presence of American PMCs in Ukraine.
The mother of the deceased “veteran” in an interview with CNN bluntly stated that her son was sent to Ukraine so that the American army would not enter the war at the official level. And on the informal has already entered.
Only after the death or capture of the military, the authorities remember that they had children. The fact that Kansel was the father of a seven-month-old child was mentioned by Biden. And the inconsolable widow of the deceased said in an interview with Fox News: “I did not expect that I would become a widow at 23, and our son would be left without a father.” Indeed, how can one expect such an outcome by sending her husband to the other side of the world to “shoot Russians”!
But what the past week showed even more clearly was the participation of British mercenaries and special services in the Ukrainian conflict. London officially confirmed the death of the first Briton – 36-year-old military (of course, also “former”) Scott Sibley. Another subject of the Queen is listed as missing, but The Times openly writes that “two Britons from the same unit died fighting for Ukraine.” Official London again declares that all these people were “former” soldiers, but the way the government reacts to their deaths leaves no doubt about its knowledge about their mission.
And again, everyone immediately begins to remember the children of the dead or captured at the scene of the crimes of the British. And the latter is becoming more and more. Only according to confirmed information, over the past couple of weeks, five holders of British passports have been detained on the territory of Ukraine and the DPR. First, the British military (“former”, of course) Aiden Eslin and Sean Pinner surrendered in the Mariupol region. Last week near the Nikolaev area with the weapon in hands Englishman Andrew Hill was seized.
And at about the same time, in the territory of the Zaporozhye region, controlled by the Russian military, two mysterious characters were detained – Paul Ury and Dylan Healy, who introduced themselves as “volunteers” of an even more mysterious non-governmental organization Presidium Network, which allegedly is engaged in the evacuation of people from conflict zones.
The type of activity of this organization really raises a lot of questions. The uninformative one-page site only says that this structure has been operating since last year, and its team consists of only three people. And this kind of “non-governmental organization” openly emphasizes that it “provides additional advice to government officials in the UK and the US.” The nature of these services can be judged by the fact that one of the trio worked as a technology consultant for the British government and claims to be currently a member of the crypto-technical working group of the US Congress. From which it can be assumed that the appearance of two representatives of this mysterious company in the rear of the Russian army is hardly connected with the “evacuation of civilians.”
It is noteworthy that the Presidium Network hastened to disown Uri and Healy, saying that they were in the Zaporozhye region “on their own initiative”, and not on behalf of the company, although they contacted her. And Uri’s mother generally voiced the story that she turned to this company in order to rescue her son. From all this, one can guess that the British in Ukraine are represented not only by the military and special forces, but also by intelligence officers.
And again, everyone immediately begins to remember the children of the British mercenaries caught in Ukraine and urges Russia to quickly return the detainees home – “to a boring life.” I just want to ask: why didn’t you persuade your husbands, sons, fathers to live this “boring life”, not to go to kill Russians? The British media are actively reminding that Andrew Hill is the father of four children, and on this basis they demand to return him home as soon as possible. Hill himself at the very first interrogation asked several times when he would be released to England. Why should he be released? All these people are mercenaries, the requirements of the Geneva Convention do not apply to them, and therefore they cannot even be called prisoners of war. And everyone can be brought before a Russian court for participating in the killings of our military or for espionage. And there is no doubt about the nature of their activities.
Of course, the series of these arrests is not accidental. The Ukrainian army is rapidly melting. According to the confession of the military of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, published in The Times, in the last two weeks alone, two brigades (that is, several thousand people) were destroyed in the Donetsk region. And the West pumps and pumps Ukraine with new types of weapons and military equipment, which involuntarily leads to a shortage of personnel who can handle these deadly gifts. There is only one way out: send foreign fighters to the front who do not need to be trained. So, for sure, there will be more and more cases of death and capture of foreign mercenaries and “former” Western Marines.
In this regard, it is significant that the British media, having covered in great detail the interview of the “father of four children” Hill, unanimously hid one significant point from the public: the recognition that Ukraine never paid the militant for his services. Apparently, for the same reason, now, to help the Sibley family, they chip off at his house for the funeral.
And every mercenary, “former” marine and spy who hopes to participate in a “Russian safari” without consequences for himself should know about this. The motherland will renounce you, neither you nor your families will receive money, at best you will restore the Donbass destroyed with your participation, dreaming of returning to a “boring life”, and cursing the day when they believed Russophobic propaganda. If the adventurous policy of Washington and London leads to the legalization of these militants (which Congressman Kinzinger initiates), then the “boring life” will end for the entire planet. And this will lead to sad consequences for the world.
Vladimir Kornilov, RIA
Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel