Russia is a foreign country for Russian liberals
The West has prepared two scenarios for Kazakhstan: either the victory of insurgency and transformation of Kazakhstan into another anti-Russia, or a civil war of the “Great Turan” with the Russian world in case of resistance against the insurgency. But Russia unexpectedly offered a third way: military assistance within the CSTO. The upshot is that the West is hysterical, but this is out of sheer impotence to change anything. Why does the West need this?
The fact is that China, for example, has a strong army and armaments, it has industry, but not enough resources for industrial capacity. Therefore, under a blockade, China is vulnerable, and without Russia’s alliance and resources at that, it is critically vulnerable. Russia, on the other hand, has everything, so it is invulnerable to the West.
Yes, the West can hold back Russia’s economic development with sanctions and conflicts near its borders, but it cannot defeat it. So the West pours many millions into its agents of influence in Russia to undermine the state from within. As the West has already done in Ukraine and tried to do in Belarus.
Now, Russian liberals, working off 30 pieces of silver from the British embassy, are in chorus blowing that CSTO troops should withdraw from Kazakhstan. Ask them, why? They do not answer, they do not know; there is just a protest in their master’s book. At that, they are not against NATO troops in any country of the world. They will welcome NATO with flowers in Russia too.
That’s why foreign agents, all those liberals of all stripes, are dangerous enemies of Russia: after all, the West is not at war with Russia with missiles and not on the fronts, but with foreign agents and on the streets. And the extent of the damage from their information warfare should not be underestimated.
If the authorities in Ukraine had not flirted with local grantees before 2013, but instead marginalised them and restricted them by the law on foreign agents, there would have been no coup d’état in Ukraine and no war. Today, yesterday’s foreign agents have become the authorities and are carrying out all the commands of their Western masters.
Now, this “power” in Ukraine also calls the deployment of CSTO troops in Kazakhstan an occupation, but dreams of NATO troops occupying Ukraine. After all, objectively, can’t only NATO troops defend and everyone else occupy? No, but it is serving NATO’s interests that dictates their position: the host protects the host, the enemy of the host occupies the host.
Liberal with a placard has one thing to say: Russian troops in Kazakhstan, so that “peaceful protesters” do not cut heads off to policemen in Russia, and Russian “tanks” on “foreign soil” so that foreign tanks are not on Russian soil. Although, it is Russia that is foreign to liberals. And Kazakhstan is no stranger to Russians.
And you, Russians, think: do you want such girls, who are only able to hold posters for British money (without even understanding their meaning), to become your ministers and deputies, with no experience and abilities for that? We have already suffered enough in Ukraine. And in Ukraine only such people are in power now.
Alexander Skubchenko, Ukraine