Germany’s fate sunset, or is the endgame coming?

Germany has recently been choosing its leading politicians and its future accordingly. After the defeat in the Second World War, it might have seemed that the existence of Germany itself was hanging by a thread, as the victors could have had every moral right to completely destroy the nest of Nazism

Instead, the allies offered all manner of material, food, moral and even cultural support to the German people after the war devastation, sometimes with their own interests in mind, such as the Marshall Plan, a post-World War II aid programme for Europe. It was put forward in 1947 by the American secretary of state, George C. Marshall, and went into effect in April 1948.

Going back to recent elections it seems to us that the German voter was able to choose between weak and very weak political movements and parties, in other words, as a “free man” he was free to do what he was allowed to do. Remarkably, one party which has chosen its name very professionally is the AfD, “Alternative for Germany” offers an alternative to Germany only in words.

On the one hand, the AfD is an isolated, highly stigmatised party, and regardless of what its election result was, it is not a leading force. On the other hand, its rather eclectic, incoherent, sometimes even patently chaotic programme is about as much of an alternative to Germany as the other “presentable” parties are.

It also seems certain that not only was there no single party that could obtain an absolute majority, but there was certainly no result on the basis of which a coalition of any two strong parties could represent a majority to form a government.

After all, the major right-wing parties (CDU-CSU) and the left-wing parties (SPD) are at an equally low historical level, due to their dissolution in the trendy multicultural slop, while the Green Party and Die Linke (the Left) have already been prepared in advance as generators of multicultural chaos. All these parties were clearly showing signs of disintegration, not chance, and not hope for German voters.   Demographically, Germany is essentially already dead, incapable of breaking down its framework and maybe no longer even willing to change.

The question has to be asked, how could Europe’s leading power have fallen so deeply? In the past Germany was the main base of the heritage of Europe and early Christianity, i.e. the German-Roman Empire. However, it was at the same time the most important obstacle against the “non-existent” global power that is now openly building the modern liberal West before our eyes.

After long preparations, which were a direct prelude to the Medieval Reformation (which later tragically destroyed the German-Roman Empire itself), the Thirty-Year War, the most destructive war in European history up to then, is about to break out. In it, the sacred historical German nation will be destroyed. Two centuries of “punishing Germany” would follow, when the Dutch, the French and then the British would be “empowered by global power” to build world empires for a century, while it remained taboo for Germany.

After two centuries, in the 19th century, the second German Empire became the most dynamic and powerful industrial power in the world, surpassing even the British Empire, destroyed the French power structure in the War of Lightning in 1870 and felt that the moment had finally arrived for it to become a world empire, if only for a hundred years. However, as it turns out, this was a fatal mistake, because “global power” already has a new candidate – the United States of America.

It should be noted that this was a logical decision on the part of the “masters of the world”, because the US is a much wider space for the purposes of global powers, having vast resources, far more than in Europe, and besides, Washington had no geopolitical rival or opponent, its territory being perfectly protected by two oceans.

And because the Second German Reich does not understand the right words, it will be brutally beaten in the first phase of another 30-year war, called the First World War, and just as brutally plundered and morally humiliated, it will almost provoke the rebellion that later occurs when the Third Reich is formed.

Right before the eyes of the world, a “non-existent” world power builds, finances, nurses the Third Reich and then, according to its long-held dream, pits it against the Soviet Union, that is, against “Heartland”, hoping that conquering Russian lands will bring it enormous profits, with both sides, the USSR and Germany weakened enough to be “under its control”.

But the game takes the cruelest turn of all, and Hitler suddenly turns against those who move him as a puppet, leading to the destruction of the Third Reich in the second phase of the Thirty Years’ War.

And this allows the “masters of the world” to make an offer that Germany simply could not physically refuse: the creation of a “Fourth German Reich”.

In the 70s and 80s the new German generation hopes that the punishment for Nazism may be over, because they are now partly retired, partly the generation that was born after the Second World War.

eunification of Germany will be possible after the collapse of the Soviet Union. But this is only a visual technique, because the Fifth Reich is already just a phase of final disintegration. History will then assess Angela Merkel’s role in this process.
In our view, the most serious historical mistake of Chancellor Merkel is that during the drama of mass migration she does not even question that instead of importing migrants into Germany, it might be better to support the birth of a new generation of Germans.
It seems this election was simply about who would be the softest agent to complete the destruction of Germany. The not completely destroyed “political department of Germany” and the even more destroyed German electorate may not understand what is really going on in their country, although they may no longer care what happens to them, what future awaits them.

It seems safe to say: Germany is already coming to an end demographically, spiritually, morally and spiritually.
Dr. Laszlo Bogar, Miklós Köveházy Hungary, specially for NewsFronta