Our liberal colleagues are trying to find an answer to this question, trying to pretend that “it does not matter to them at all”.
It does, it soes.
And we are talking, of course, about a certain political game. First you need to figure out how serious the violations were in the US presidential elections.
It is clear that the radiance of the “hail on the hill” dimmed strongly back in 2016 and we have already discussed this in sufficient detail.
Now, I am sure, the US establishment will demand from its clients in other countries the unconditional recognition of the elections as legal and, attention, absolutely honest, without any “highly likely” there.
The requirement will be tough. So let’s see how it ends…
Assessing the legitimacy of this kind of elections, which took place in the United States, is difficult, but this just underlines the fact that “there are questions” and they remain. Both now and in the future.
It is easy to compare elections in the USA and elections in Russia: our system is easily modified, flexible and modern; and the US electoral system is archaic, amorphous, and confusing. Therefore, observers are not admitted and are infringed upon, if admitted.
Alexey Mukhin