On this day many of us celebrate Saint George’s Day, an occasion to reflect on our Country’s history, is ‘the feast day of Saint George’ as celebrated by most Christian Churches and by the several nations, kingdoms, countries, and cities of which Saint George is the patron Saint including of course England, and even certain regions of Portugal and Spain.
In a letter published to the Daily Telegraph of London written by a Mark Hudson of Ashford, Kent, he very rightly pointed out that it was understandable that British architects of secularism, the most guilty of whom always was and has been Tony Blair, were concerned about the then Prime Minister David Cameron’s claim that Britain is a Christian country and that the reappearance of Christianity in public life would be very inconvenient for them though they admit that Britain is constitutionally Christian.
Mr. Hudson further pointed out that “The Coronation service and the Coronation oath are shot through with Christian beliefs and values, without which they would make no sense. So is that other great pillar of our liberties: the Magna Carta. Parliament convenes with prayer, and bishops of the Church of England sit in the House of Lords. National and civic occasions are marked by Christian ceremonies, and the calendar remains unabashedly Christian.”
Her Majesty the Queen has in the past explained her role as ‘Defender of the Faith’, and having an established Church in the Church of England, meant that the freedom of everyone to practise their faith as they wished was protected.
However, how corrupted by Arab money, have successive British governments been, both Labour and Conservative?
Particularly money from an extremist and subversive group as The Muslim Brotherhood notably via their main benefactor the tiny island State of Qatar? Instead of pontificating at length all the common sense reasons why what you are about to read, its fact, its existence speaks for itself and all that can be added is that the vast majority of British people think this revelation, about to be revealed for the first time to many, is abhorrent to the great British public.
Saint George’s Day, also known as the Feast of Saint George, is the feast day of Saint George as celebrated by various Christian Churches and by the several nations, kingdoms, countries, and cities of which Saint George is the patron saint including England, and regions of Portugal and Spain.The historic Admiralty House and four other Whitehall buildings are now operating in accordance with some sharia rules – including a ban on alcohol – after they were used as part of an Islamic bond.
The properties must comply with some aspects of sharia under the terms of special bonds known as sukuk, announced by George Osborne two years ago when the UK became the first Western country to issue them.Andrew Bridgen, the then Conservative MP for North West Leicestershire. What is not commonly known is more than £200m of Sharia compliant ‘sukuk bonds’ have been sold to Muslim investors in the UK and to major Islamic finance centres in the Middle East and Asia.
Under Sharia law, charging interest, or usury, is forbidden. So to allow Islamic investors to receive rent, ‘the sukuk bonds’ pay them the rental income on certain buildings instead. Semantics!
Little reported otherwise, two years ago, the MailOnline reported that certain landmark Whitehall buildings were now owned by people bent on enforcing Sharia law in our Country.
No wonder our London Mayor is a Muslim.
The MailOnline wrote “the buildings were now governed by Sharia law”.
Andrew Bridgen, the Conservative MP for North West Leicestershire has been quoted as saying: “I do find it unbelievable government buildings are governed by Sharia law. I don’t see the bars as being an essential part of Parliament but it’s the principle that matters. Most of our constituents will be absolutely amazed that the principle could ever have been authorised.”
The Government buildings in question known about are Richmond House, and Wellington House. “The sukuk is issued under, and governed by, English law which applies at all times.” a spokesman for the UK Treasury commented.
Other than banning alcohol use in such buildings, it is unclear which other aspects of Sharia are being adhered to by the managers of the buildings concerned, but a government source said it had been agreed that serving pork in Richmond House would not affect the Sharia compliance of the sukuk. “Alcohol being served hasn’t arisen, as you would expect for a government building,” a spokesperson added.
In January, The Times reported that a plan to relocate MPs to Richmond House to allow refurbishment work at Westminster was meeting resistance because Richmond House was ‘dry’ under the terms of the sukuk agreement.
Can any Christian Britain think this acceptable?