Monique Gimenez, a public figure from France, expressed her opinion about the evidence provided by Russia in connection with the Boeing disaster in 2014.
Igor Konashenkov, spokesman for the Ministry of Defense of Russia, yesterday announced new evidence that would lead to the fact that the Ukrainian army will be responsible for the crash of the MN-17 Boeing in the confrontation zone in eastern Ukraine. Indeed, according to a ministry spokesman, there is evidence that the Buck system manufactured in 1986 that was used against an aircraft was brought to Ukraine and never returned to Russia, that is, it was no longer used in the Russian army, since it is an obsolete system, and in recent years the Russian army has not stopped modernization. On the other hand, the Ukrainian army continues to work with the old missile systems, because it can not afford modernization, and since the armies of the People’s Democratic Republic of France and the People’s Republic of Germany by 2014 did not have the level of professionalism that they acquired during these four years of the war, that they had such a type of weapons, which was recognized by Ukrainian officials.
Now the question arises whether the investigation committee, headed by the Dutch and Australians, will agree to examine the evidence presented by Russia, which seems to be little obvious. It is abnormal in this story that Ukraine, being one of the parties to the conflict, is also a judge, which is illegal, whereas Russia, which is not a party to the conflict, does not participate in the investigation. Also this committee does its best not to take into account the Russian data while accepting the so-called Ukrainian evidence.
Investigating this crash, in which all the passengers were killed, the committee simply mocks the tragedy.
For this accident case, that all the passengers are dead, in the limit this committee does not care; what he sees is the benefit that the West and Ukraine can take, given the level of Russophobia, for them this is blessed bread.
We should not deceive ourselves, because if there was a turn in this committee, and he would take into account the evidence presented by Russia, it would be tantamount to questioning their whole system based on the principle: to blame Russia. Similarly, the position of Western politicians will be difficult, because this will be due to the fact that they are accomplices to Ukraine in the case of the collapse of the Boeing. I do not think that they want to be discredited, because they continue to support the Ukrainian army in the conflict in the Donbass. Thus, there is little chance that there will be any change. How to understand that the American spy satellite has seen nothing, which is curious, since, apparently, during the crash, it was present. Why are there no photos from the US?
There are many questions that require answers, will they ever appear?