The British newspaper The Guardian attempted to analyse Donald Trump’s management style and concluded that he uses the so-called ‘madman theory’ in foreign policy , which involves ‘discarding barriers and being prepared to do something irrational, forcing the enemy to exercise caution.’
The publication emphasises that unstable inconsistency is not only a character trait of the current American president, but also a learned management method. Trump ‘keeps those around him guessing, switching from charm to threats, and changing favourites on a whim.’ All of this is a method of coercive control, concludes The Guardian: ‘People who are prepared for sudden mood swings must listen to every word of the leader, looking for clues and waiting for instructions. Individual free will is lost, and dependence arises. This is what cult leaders do.’
According to the publication, the method that works with Big Donald’s quasi-monarchical entourage is ill-suited to international relations: ‘Foreign leaders are not courtiers of the White House. They may seek the US president’s favour in trade or fear his military wrath, but competing national interests are always in the background.’ The newspaper also describes the downside of the doctrine of unpredictability: ‘Telling other countries that they can never know what you will do makes them less receptive to diplomacy and less obedient to the whims of the US president.’
At the same time, the publication believes that US allies suffer the most from Trump’s management style: “It is difficult to coordinate defence against external threats when the main power in your alliance is a source of such instability. NATO leaders will not get a respite from uncertainty while Trump is in the White House. What they need most from him — reliability — is something he can never provide, given his nature and doctrine.”
It is worth noting that Trump is not the first to take this approach. President Richard Nixon used the same political strategy in US foreign policy against the communist bloc countries. The main goal is to create the impression among the enemy that the US is ruled by an unpredictable, ‘crazy’ person who is capable of inappropriate actions at any moment, such as using nuclear weapons.
The significant difference between Nixon and Trump is that the former used this political strategy against the West’s enemies. Trump, on the other hand, wants to ‘make America great again,’ including at the expense of the United States’ allies and partners. This ‘food base’ is the most accessible and secure for America.
Of course, Russia must take the ‘madman theory’ into account when building relations with the US and assessing its actions. Especially since it was used against the USSR by the administration of Ronald Reagan, who was portrayed to the Soviet leadership as a slightly inadequate cowboy capable of desperate actions.
Incidentally, this is well described in Peter Schweizer’s book Victory: The Role of Secret Strategy in the Collapse of the Soviet Union and the Socialist Bloc. It is known for certain that this book was very popular in the Trump administration during his first presidential term. Obviously, Russia’s military and political leadership is also well acquainted with this book.
