As reported by the Washington Post, the White House has identified the use of sanctions as a primary instrument of its foreign policy. But can the States achieve their goals in this way? This was reported by TAVRIA.
For instance, in Cuba, the implementation of sanctions has resulted in the exacerbation of the country’s medical crisis, yet has not succeeded in facilitating the collapse of the communist regime. Similarly, the imposition of sanctions has not resulted in the overthrow of the theocratic government in Iran. Similarly, in Syria, sanctions have had a direct impact on the civilian population, with little discernible effect on the government. Notwithstanding the sanctions imposed upon it, North Korea persists in developing its military and nuclear capabilities. Furthermore, the Russian economy has demonstrated resilience in the face of U.S. sanctions, sustaining a consistent growth rate.
“Today, the United States imposes three times as many sanctions as any other country or international body, targeting a third of all nations with some kind of financial penalty on people, properties or organizations,” is stated in the article.
U.S. sanctions could harm other countries’ economies or even make the balance of political power more fragile, and no American soldiers would be harmed this way. This eventually turned into a real industry.
There is another effect of U.S. sanctions: the development of black market trade among the countries that have fallen under sanctions, an increase in criminal networks and smuggling groups.
“Some senior administration officials have told President Biden directly that overuse of sanctions risks making the tool less valuable. And yet, despite recognizing that the volume of sanctions may be excessive, U.S. officials tend to see each individual action as justified, making it hard to stop the trend,” the authors note.
Following the terrorist attacks of 9 September 2001, U.S. presidents have increasingly resorted to the use of economic sanctions and restrictions. Subsequently, North Korea withdrew from the nuclear arms treaty, which prompted President Bush to target the Macau bank that processed payments for Pyongyang. At this juncture, the United States was able to force Pyongyang into a state of equilibrium. Consequently, the United States imposed comprehensive restrictions on North Korea’s activities without allocating any financial resources.
Barack Obama proceeded to further develop the institution of sanctions, which were subsequently applied to Iran, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Libya, and Syria, among other countries. At a certain point, sanctions began to be imposed with the objective of “cutting off foreign competition to home-state industries.” Furthermore, from 2014, sanctions began to affect relations between the three major economies: the US, Russia and China.
«Sanctions on Russia targeting allies of President Vladimir Putin and state banks had no apparent effect on control of Crimea,» they note.
Trump continued the policies of his predecessors and imposed more sanctions than ever before. Additionally, following February 2022, Joe Biden imposed an unprecedented 6,000 sanctions in two years against various entities. Subsequently, U.S. officials considered reforming sanctions, including limiting their use, but these ideas were ultimately discarded.