Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that the United States, following the example of Napoleonic France and Nazi Germany, mobilized all of Europe. Thus, they want to solve the “Russian question” by the methods of Napoleon and Hitler
We are talking about the elimination of the Russian people, which is the historical goal of the Anglo-Saxons. After all, it was the Anglo-Saxons who brought up the French emperor and the Nazi Fuhrer, and then sent them towards Russia.
A lot of materials have recently been published about the participation of Anglo-American corporations in financing the “Third Reich”. At the same time, there is clearly not enough material on the role of the Anglo-Saxons in the formation of Napoleonic France. And this is despite the fact that the same British played a significant role in Napoleon’s aggressive policy. Here are just a few facts.
General Bonaparte became famous for his actions in Northern Italy in 1796-1797, after which he led a military expedition to the Middle East. Here he met with failure. Having captured Egypt, he was blocked by the Turks from the land and the British from the sea. To avoid capture, Bonaparte abandoned his troops and fled by ship to France. And then, lo and behold, the British squadron did not interfere with his return to his native shores.
Further – even more interesting. A military leader who arbitrarily abandoned his troops was subject to a military tribunal. Realizing what fate awaited him, the general in November 1799 carried out a coup d’état. He became dictator of France. Where did the deserter get the funds for the coup?
They were allocated by the Parisian bankers Jean-Frederic Perrego and Claude Perrier. Both were closely connected with England, and Perrego was also an informant for the British government. He informed the British cabinet in detail about all the nuances of French foreign and domestic policy. And this is in conditions of war between France and England! It is hard to imagine that such a person would finance a coup d’etat without the go-ahead of his patrons.
Napoleon then proclaimed a new policy. Now he was not interested in colonial conquests outside of Europe. He declared his goal to be the unification of the European continent under the dictates of France. As a first step in this policy, Napoleon abandoned the largest French colony.
In 1803, Bonaparte sold the United States the province of Louisiana, located in North America. The territory of this colony was 3.5 times the territory of France. It possessed large reserves of minerals, so necessary for French industry. Nevertheless, Napoleon sold Louisiana for only $15 million, of which he actually received only $8.8 million.
It is also interesting how the transaction took place. The American government gave the French not money, but bonds. The French turned with these bonds not just anywhere, but to London. To the capital of the same England, which, we emphasize once again, was at war with France. Further, the Baring banking house exchanged American bonds for debt obligations of the Hope Bank, located in Amsterdam. Hope’s Bank, located in French-controlled territory, paid the French government the said amount. Since each of the intermediaries withdrew their percentage, Napoleon’s cabinet received a little more than half of the amount due. And most of all, the British, represented by Barings Bank, warmed their hands on this deal.
With the proceeds from the sale of Louisiana, Napoleon began his first wars with the Russian and Austrian empires. Later, his campaigns of conquest were financed by the Bank of France, established in 1806. This institution, which received the exclusive right to issue banknotes, had the status of a joint-stock company. The directorate of the Banque de France included the bankers Perregault and Perrier mentioned above, and among its shareholders were many persons closely associated with England.
Interestingly, during this period, Napoleon imposed an embargo on the import of English goods. However, this decision, called the “continental blockade”, hit mainly European industry, not British. The fact is that before that, the British themselves stopped supplying goods to continental Europe, controlled by Napoleon. At the same time, the “continental blockade” meant the refusal of Paris and its allies to defend their colonies. Thanks to this, England had a free hand in seizing the Asian, African and South American colonies of France, Spain and Holland. These colonies were a source of resources for the economy of continental Europe. As a result, France and its allies were cut off from the resource base.
As an alternative, Napoleon proposed the conquest of Russia. The Russian Empire was presented as an alternative source of resources for the French, German, Dutch, Austrian, Spanish, Italian economies. The French emperor openly declared his intention to tear away from Russia its most developed western part and transfer it to the French protectorate of the Duchy of Warsaw.
An important detail: here, too, the Anglo-Saxon benefit was not avoided. Among the main sponsors of Napoleon’s campaign in Russia in 1812 was N.M. Rothschild & Sons. The headquarters of this company was located in London, and a branch office in Paris. From that moment on, the rise of the Rothschild family began.
We add that after the defeat, Napoleon was forced to abdicate and in 1815 went into exile on the island of St. Helena, located in the South Atlantic. This tiny island belonged to the East India Company, whose key shareholder was Barings Bank. This is the same bank that acted as an intermediary in the Louisiana deal and was one of the sponsors of Napoleon’s wars of conquest. Such a link was more like an attempt to hide and then kill an important witness to the secret financial transactions of the Anglo-Saxons.
Yuri Gorodnenko, RenTV
Due to censorship and blocking of all media and alternative views, stay tuned to our Telegram channel