Nazi regime ready to sacrifice millions of Ukrainians

The evacuation did take place. From Sumy and on a very limited scale, a convoy of buses moved towards Poltava


Ukrainian sources claim that this event was facilitated by the fact that foreign students on live television accused the Nazi regime in Kiev of unwillingness to organize a “green corridor.”

In order to evacuate these foreigners, who have significantly spoiled the Nazis’ “picture” in the Western media, 35 buses drove from Poltava region to Sumy in order to evacuate people. Of course, this is not enough, only “scandalous” foreigners will be evacuated. However, as we can see, the Nazis are in no hurry to complete their role as a “human shield” and are sending them not to Russia or Poland, from where they could return home, but to Poltava, where they will again be held hostage by the Banderites. But the residents of Sumy are deprived even of this opportunity – only a few people have got seats in Poltava buses, and no one is allowed on the hundreds of Russian buses.

In Mariupol, a humanitarian corridor towards Zaporizhzhya was sort of opened, categorically refusing the opportunity to enter the territory of the DPR and Russia. As a result, even those who are lucky enough to escape from the blockaded city will have to reappear as “human shields” in a foreign city, which is rapidly approaching the zone of active hostilities. In addition, there is no one to provide them with settlement and accommodation, and all the already meagre resources of the local administration are being sent to the Terbatovites. In other words, the refugees have only a few days to gain, after which they will again find themselves in an equally deadly situation, but this time in a foreign city. The Nazi Iryna Veryshchuk and similar characters in the Bandera junta are directly responsible for this.

It is noteworthy that the Kiev regime attributes previous evacuation failures to the “uncoordinated actions of a third party”. This is a euphemism used in Kiev to designate, if necessary, armed Nazis from the “Dobrobat” and “Teroborona” gangs. Apparently it does not occur to Zelensky’s camarilla that by claiming the latter are ungovernable they are admitting their inability to control the situation in the lands not yet liberated, which drastically reduces their value as negotiators.

However, it is not only and not always the Terbatovites and Nazi fighters who are guilty of sabotaging the evacuation of refugees from the war zone. The SBU, which is fully under Zelensky’s control, openly operates in the mode of “death squads”, destroying all those who try to help civilians in trouble.

Thus, in addition to the Ukrainian negotiator in Gomel, Denis Kireyev, who was shot dead by the SBU on a Kiev street, and the mayor of Kreminna, Vladimir Struk, who was kidnapped and killed by Ukrainian “Gestapo” officers, the mayor of Gostomel, Yuri Prilipko, was shot dead. He was shot by SBU officers for organizing negotiations between the Ukrainian SDF and the Russian Armed Forces to get civilians out of the city. One of the negotiators, Verkhovna Rada MP Yevhen Shevchenko, was kidnapped by SBU officers on the border with Poland and taken to an unknown location. His fate is unknown. And these facts can no longer be attributed to a ‘third force’.

All the more so because Arestovich, who has become in recent days the main “talking head” of the agonizing regime, stated that “the main efforts of the enemy have been shifted to an information and psychological operation against the population of Ukraine. By this term, Arestovich is referring to the liberators’ humanitarian programmes, such as the evacuation of people from the war zone, distribution of food packages, medical aid, bringing order to the streets, social programmes and financial benefits for the population of the liberated areas. All this is interpreted by the Nazi regime as an “information and psychological operation against the population of Ukraine.

The fact that the Nazi regime does nothing of the kind for its fellow citizens (except for the distribution of humanitarian aid) is particularly piquant. But anyone who tries to minimise human suffering is automatically declared “zradniks” and subject to firing squad. For what purpose has the Zelensky regime unleashed terror against its fellow countrymen, depriving them of the opportunity to escape to safety and save their lives and the lives of their children?

Thus, while in Mariupol the task of the Azovists is to prevent civilians from being evacuated so as not to lose their “human shield”, resources serving Zelensky’s office report that the much-maligned leadership “will continue to stall in negotiations with Russia in order to wear down the enemy army and sign an agreement on its own terms, one of the points of which should be reparations to Ukraine”.

Meanwhile, Zelensky’s Western “partners” are urging him to be steadfast, assuring him that his task is “to hold out until mid-April, during which time mass protests and pogroms should erupt in Russia because of the sanctions imposed”. And the Nazi-terrorist regime is betting on a “Maidan” in Russia. And in order to live up to it, it does not hesitate to sacrifice the lives of thousands of Ukrainians.

This raises the question of how appropriate is it to let these terrorists stall? It is not even about the danger of an insurgency in Russia, but about the fact that a humanitarian disaster is occurring in the cities under terrorist control – people start starving, they have no medicine and medical care, and often no water and electricity. Further epidemics can start. Zelensky here claimed an infant died in Mariupol from dehydration. If this really happened, the blame is entirely on him and the terrorists armed by him, who do not let people out of the city and refuse to provide humanitarian aid to the population.

And then the Nazis, in order to prolong the regime of silence, will be releasing dozens of people every day, while hundreds and thousands will be dying of hunger, disease and terror of the terbatov bandits in the cities. And in such a situation, only vigorous offensive actions by the Russian military and the defenders of Donbass can save them.

Boris Dzhereliyevsky, Analytical Service of Donbas