A few days ago, the car of the country’s leading nuclear physicist was shot in Iran, and he himself was killed
I, stupid, thought that it was a criminal offense, a terrorist act (political activity by methods of terror, strictly according to the textbook) and an act of war, in fact, a casus belli.
But the non-friendly Western media explained to me (and everyone else) that this scientist is actually a vicious terrorist. And killing him preventively was good and right.
I specifically looked at the assessment of this event in a number of American and British media. Everyone vied with each other to tell that everything was done correctly. They killed a terrorist – and everything is good.
And, again, due to natural naivety, I thought that no one could be found guilty otherwise than by a court decision. And not a single court recognized Moskhen Fakhrizade as a terrorist.
But, as it turned out, in humane countries and those living according to the principle of the rule of law, this is also not needed for a long time. You just kill whoever you deem necessary, and then after the fact you declare him a terrorist.
Because “he could have wanted to create a nuclear bomb, which means he is guilty”.
Again, before this (at the beginning of the year), IRGC General Soleimani, an official, was killed in a similar way. And also, “because he is dangerous”. No court decisions, no UN mandates, no entry into terrorist bases – but that’s it, arbitrarily.
A citizen of another country on the territory of another country outside the zone of his jurisdiction.
No, seriously! I really want to join the ranks of the light-faced non-polite (spoiler: no), so I’m interested in how to act in order to get approval from the world democratic community.
I am writing down: it is possible to preemptively destroy those who can potentially pose a threat to national security. Okay.
Turchinov said that Ukraine needs to create missiles capable of reaching Moscow and St. Petersburg – we write it down. Tymoshenko dreamed of dropping a nuclear bomb on Donbass – we add. A whole herd of dill politicians and bloggers talked about the explosions of “dirty” bombs – all on the list. Participants of the Ukrop missile program – one and the same.
That is, if Russia destroys all these (and other) terrorists, then no one will object, do I understand correctly? After all, this is just an imitation of the most advanced countries in the world, and they do nothing bad. It is so?
In general, I went to agree on the list of terrorists. So you want to be like the right White People.
Alexander Rogers, exclusively for News Front